Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Those results follow the usual trends , larger A/R turbine housing uncorks the hot side of the engine pressure balance equation and you often end up with the same power at lower boost pressure .

This is a good example of increasing the gas flow by removing a restriction , it also means lower charge air temps and lower fuel rail pressure so mostly good . The only downside is that the turbine spins up later in the engines rev range because the larger turbine housing passage means low gas velocity through the turbine housings nozzle until the engines revs climb a little higher .

Actually I always wondered what a GT3076R would be like with a 1.06 A/R GT30 turbine housing but its not a combination any ones tried as far as I know .

Throttle vs boost response works really well with larger A/R twin scroll housings but until Garrett gets the lead out and makes twin scroll twin integral gate turbine housings like IHI and a few other manufacturers do don't hold your breath .

Very interested to see how that real GT3071R 0.63 A/R build goes .

Noise , yep nearly always goes up because there is less pulse damping between the exhaust valves and the turbine housings nozzle .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

yep,

I did the same conversion on an Rb26 with the same turbo. I just drove the car for the first time with the 1.06 turbine housing and its heaps louder. Actually, i dunno if i can live with it with the trust 3.5 inch exhaust. I also found that the turbo performs like a light switch; its nothing, nothing, nothing, then wheel spin. I love that banshee wastegate scream though!

Shaun.

yeah its definatly much more agressive thats for sure

yep,

I did the same conversion on an Rb26 with the same turbo. I just drove the car for the first time with the 1.06 turbine housing and its heaps louder. Actually, i dunno if i can live with it with the trust 3.5 inch exhaust. I also found that the turbo performs like a light switch; its nothing, nothing, nothing, then wheel spin. I love that banshee wastegate scream though!

Shaun.

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to dig up an old thread, but has anyone else since done this swap?

Really keen on getting some more information on it as im considering doing this at the moment. Id also be interested in seeing how much peak power increased by.

Turbine map for GT3582R/GT3540R .

Yep the 1.06 is quite a jump over the 0.82 , if you can look down the passages from the mount flange side with a torch the difference is very obvious .

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...8-allturb_e.jpg

Cheers A .

my power went from about 350rwkw to 380ishrwkw from the turbo upgrade.

Do you have a graph to compare boost response?

Sounds like it makes the car a lot less linear.

ps. I have a spare 1.06 rear for a GT35 if anyone wants it cheap....

That graph shows a hell of a lot more flow A so cheers.

GT, how did the thing feel? For someone like me who isnt going to use the car for drifting is it a worthwhile update? The 30kws comment is definitley encouraging as im going to use the car for drag racing primarily and that will make a big difference but dont want the thing to be too much of a dog to drive. You dont have any dyno charts do you?

Did you notice any boost control differences, as im having massive issues with my 44tial on the .82?

Brockas, cheers for the offer. Im in NZ and sending a housing may be a tad expensive.

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...