Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a theory that boost pressure is probably relative to turbocharger life in an exponential relationship.

Obviously this belief would allow for some turbos surviving on 12psi, some not, some surviving on 14psi+ and some not.

Basically, your turbo will last for X amount of time running 7/8 psi (ie stock boost). X is unknown obviously, but we can safely assume that X probably represents quite a long time, maybe 10 years?

At say 10 psi, you might find your turbo will now only last for X/2. But if your turbo is going to last for 10 years at 7/8 psi, its still going to last for another 5 at 10psi. So still a long time.

At 12psi, you might then find that turbo life has shortened to X/4, in other words, 2.5 years. Starting to shorten now.

Bump boost up to 14psi and you may find turbo life reduces further to X/8, or just over a year before failure.

16psi, a bit over 6 months... you get the picture.

If this theory of mine is correct, it obviously allows for other factors influencing the unknown X value. Newer car (and therefore newer turbo), better maintained, better condition turbos might have an initial X value far higher than a car that has been neglected, has already been run at a higher boost, is older, etc etc.

The problem is with imports, you never really can expect to know the *exact* and entire history of the car, and even still you are only making an educated guess as to the turbos lifespan.

I personally run mine at 10psi. I do not believe that this will severly limit the lifespan of the turbo.

12psi would be reasonably safe too in my opinion. There becomes a real risk of failure, but in most cases an acceptable one.

If your turbocharger *is* in good condition, I dont think there would be any reason for premature failure, as the turbo is still operating efficiently (and so temperatures are under control)

At 14psi, things become more iffy. Basically it becomes much more luck oriented. I know of people personally who have run 14psi on an RB25 with no problem. I also have read of plenty who have had failure at this level.

To run 14psi you need to be willing and able to replace your turbo as there is a significant level of risk of failure at this stage, due to higher shaft speed and increased temperatures.

Anything above 14psi in my opinion is pretty stupid. You would not do this without being very much ready to replace your turbo, in which case you might as well just go ahead with replacing it and sell the stock one to recover some cost?

A few hundered $$ off the cost of the replacement is stupid to throw away for nothing more than running above 14psi simply for the sake of it?

Obviously this all may or may not be correct, its just an educated estimation of how things could likely work that Ive come to by observation.

Biggest problem is that its still a bit of a dark art once boost pressures are raised.

We know 100% is that there is NO magic number.

We know 100% that turbo life is reduced at some level as boost pressures rise

Its then just a case of making an informed decision and trying out a number for yourself and hoping its not one that is too high for your turbo to handle :D

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 months later...

High exhaust temp also hurts turbos. So leaner a/F ratios or excessively retarded ignition would cause turbo failure, more so at high boost.

There's more than one way to kill yourself and more than one way to kill a turbo. Combinations just increase the risk.

Running 14psi and a lean A/F ratio is like being a basejumper who loves to carry knives in his parachute bag. Sure someone always knows somebody who has done it since he was a kid, but we are all waiting to see the "freak accident" on Today Tonight.

well i just put in a ebc and my low boost is on 6 and high on 14 on a stock turbo r34gtt its been like that for 5 months now and no problems (YET)

Why would u put low setting at 6psi when its standard at 7psi?

Depends on tune and most times alot of luck. Ran my std 34gtt turbo at 12 for a yr then got bored and uped it to 14.7 and that lasted a yr b4 it went bang but i was prepared to buy a new one. Somewhere round the 12 mark seems about right b4 putting more stress on the shaft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...