Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a theory that boost pressure is probably relative to turbocharger life in an exponential relationship.

Obviously this belief would allow for some turbos surviving on 12psi, some not, some surviving on 14psi+ and some not.

Basically, your turbo will last for X amount of time running 7/8 psi (ie stock boost). X is unknown obviously, but we can safely assume that X probably represents quite a long time, maybe 10 years?

At say 10 psi, you might find your turbo will now only last for X/2. But if your turbo is going to last for 10 years at 7/8 psi, its still going to last for another 5 at 10psi. So still a long time.

At 12psi, you might then find that turbo life has shortened to X/4, in other words, 2.5 years. Starting to shorten now.

Bump boost up to 14psi and you may find turbo life reduces further to X/8, or just over a year before failure.

16psi, a bit over 6 months... you get the picture.

If this theory of mine is correct, it obviously allows for other factors influencing the unknown X value. Newer car (and therefore newer turbo), better maintained, better condition turbos might have an initial X value far higher than a car that has been neglected, has already been run at a higher boost, is older, etc etc.

The problem is with imports, you never really can expect to know the *exact* and entire history of the car, and even still you are only making an educated guess as to the turbos lifespan.

I personally run mine at 10psi. I do not believe that this will severly limit the lifespan of the turbo.

12psi would be reasonably safe too in my opinion. There becomes a real risk of failure, but in most cases an acceptable one.

If your turbocharger *is* in good condition, I dont think there would be any reason for premature failure, as the turbo is still operating efficiently (and so temperatures are under control)

At 14psi, things become more iffy. Basically it becomes much more luck oriented. I know of people personally who have run 14psi on an RB25 with no problem. I also have read of plenty who have had failure at this level.

To run 14psi you need to be willing and able to replace your turbo as there is a significant level of risk of failure at this stage, due to higher shaft speed and increased temperatures.

Anything above 14psi in my opinion is pretty stupid. You would not do this without being very much ready to replace your turbo, in which case you might as well just go ahead with replacing it and sell the stock one to recover some cost?

A few hundered $$ off the cost of the replacement is stupid to throw away for nothing more than running above 14psi simply for the sake of it?

Obviously this all may or may not be correct, its just an educated estimation of how things could likely work that Ive come to by observation.

Biggest problem is that its still a bit of a dark art once boost pressures are raised.

We know 100% is that there is NO magic number.

We know 100% that turbo life is reduced at some level as boost pressures rise

Its then just a case of making an informed decision and trying out a number for yourself and hoping its not one that is too high for your turbo to handle :D

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 months later...

High exhaust temp also hurts turbos. So leaner a/F ratios or excessively retarded ignition would cause turbo failure, more so at high boost.

There's more than one way to kill yourself and more than one way to kill a turbo. Combinations just increase the risk.

Running 14psi and a lean A/F ratio is like being a basejumper who loves to carry knives in his parachute bag. Sure someone always knows somebody who has done it since he was a kid, but we are all waiting to see the "freak accident" on Today Tonight.

well i just put in a ebc and my low boost is on 6 and high on 14 on a stock turbo r34gtt its been like that for 5 months now and no problems (YET)

Why would u put low setting at 6psi when its standard at 7psi?

Depends on tune and most times alot of luck. Ran my std 34gtt turbo at 12 for a yr then got bored and uped it to 14.7 and that lasted a yr b4 it went bang but i was prepared to buy a new one. Somewhere round the 12 mark seems about right b4 putting more stress on the shaft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
    • I can donate $100 to your upgrade fund. So long as you can donate the IC7 my way....
    • I'd love a Haltech ECU, and Haltech 10 dash. Was having a chat with Rob and Andy @ Haltech when Rob put one in his MR2. First one I'm kind of interested in too, as you can dim it RIGHT down. Andy was saying bright dashes is one of his peeves too!
×
×
  • Create New...