Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Righto.

I have a 2000 model R34 GTT, have owned it for almost 2 months.

I havent driven another R34 so have nothing to compare to - but I find my traction control to be over-sensitive,

as in it kicks in WAY too soon before there can possibly be any wheel-spin happening.

I'm talking about on dry roads (never mind wet roads)... say a mildly spirited lauch from a set of lights, or similar acceleration from 60 - 80KMH, it kicks in and you can hear/feel the engine being held back.

It's so bad that normally I turn off the traction control every time I start the car (if I remember!).

it can be highly annoying when you forget to turn it off...

Wheels/are 18x8 & 18x9.5, 'el cheapo brand tyres (brand escapes me right now) 225 front 255's rear.

The logic behind buying cheap tyres was that I figured I should start with a cheap set of tyres, until the novelty of owning a Skyline settled down!

But damn, they are attrocious in the wet... but I digress :banana:

The next set of tyres will be good quality, that is my normal choice (such as Kumho Ectas for example).

As far as I know the diff etc is all stock.

So, does this sound like fairly typical GTT behaviour, or might I have some mechanical problem?

A consequence of tyres and/or differing tyre sizes?

I was also wondering whether the traction control can be adjusted in some way, made a lot less senstive?

That would seem to me to be the best solution. Failing that, maybe have it turned off by default, instead of on.

Because ideally I'd rather still have the system functioning rather than disabling it completely.

Or is the only 'solution' to disable it?

Thoughts or experiences people?

Thanks :D

Edited by Wayne_J

I think someone on forums built a traction control cancelling circuit that would automatically turn the circuit off every time you start the car, saves you from pressing the button each time.

Search for TCS cancellation or something along those lines

I think someone on forums built a traction control cancelling circuit that would automatically turn the circuit off every time you start the car, saves you from pressing the button each time.

Search for TCS cancellation or something along those lines

Thanks Nuff, found the thread - a couple of years old but I PM'd Dan to see if he's still making these circuits, they sound like just the thing.

Ta :teehee:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...