Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all , im looking at getting the above mentioned car

just wanting to know how many km i should be looking at per tank and also , how much does it cost to fill a tank?

another quick q - how reliable are these cars , i know power is easy to get from them but am i going to be replacing the motor once it hits 150xxx km?

most seem to be around the 10x xxx km mark , so how many more kms do they have in them?

cheers guys and gals!

ps if anyone wants to show me there r33 gtst s2 manual that they have for sale in melb or close to , give me a pm and we can have a chat

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212741-r33-gts-t-s2-manual-qs/
Share on other sites

should get 400+k's easy on a stocker depending on how you drive it. more for highway driving.

in general the car is very reliable, obviously the more you modify it the more risk of problems as with any car. that said there are always lemons in any bunch of cars usually because of how poorly the previous owner(s) have maintained it so always do a thorough check.

they hav plenty more k's on them based on how heavily modded it is.

all comes down to how its been maintained before it hits your hands.

should get 400+k's easy on a stocker depending on how you drive it. more for highway driving.

in general the car is very reliable, obviously the more you modify it the more risk of problems as with any car. that said there are always lemons in any bunch of cars usually because of how poorly the previous owner(s) have maintained it so always do a thorough check.

they hav plenty more k's on them based on how heavily modded it is.

all comes down to how its been maintained before it hits your hands.

yeah true. , everything seems to be around the 100 xxx km mark which is really just under 10k KM a year , so i suppose thats pretty decent.

i suppose im better off buying a stocker , but if i find something with a few mods ie exhaust,cooler,wheels it should be alright.

than for ya help

Mines a 32 not a 33 but I get between 450-500kms out of a tank every week but I probably dont drive as hard as most.Only mods to mine are Exhaust and pod filter(135kws at wheels) My 32 has just clocked up 235000 ks(Had it from 71000ks)and has been extremely reliable/nil breakdowns. It all how you drive/maintain them.cheers Marty

Edited by martyg58

Couldnt agree more with the responses here.

If its been well maintained you shouldnt have a problem at all. That said, perhaps at 150,000kms a few gaskets will most likley need changing if it hasnt already done so.

In terms of kms per tank. Anywhere from 350-450 depending on mods on the car and how you drive it.

If its seing something less than 300 than theres a problem with the car or how the car has been tuned (if it has)

Agree with everything that has been said here. But I'll just point out that most of them have had their clocks wound back at some point in their life. If its got 100xxx on the clock you may aswell add another 50 - 70 thousand kms onto that and you would be closer the mark. Make sure you look at the interior when your looking at one. Worn steering wheel, seats and gear stick cover are all signs that the car most likely has over 150,000kms on it. Also the syncros on 4th and 5th gear tend to let go in the r33's when you get into the higher kms. Give it a hard change into 4th and 5th if it crunches thats another indicator of the true mileage on the car.

Dont be put off by this though because they are still really reliable, as long as you look after them :) Good luck on buying one you won't regret it

  • 2 weeks later...

Forget abotu looking at the KM's as stated above they are almost all wound back. For a real idea of KM look at things like the drivers seat, you will see wear on the outside hip support, also check the 'leather' on the handbrake boot, the wear on the gearstick and also on the steering wheel. This will tell you how much use the car has had

As for fuel consumption, if you really have to ask then it will cost too much. I have a big thread on fuel economy for R33 gts-t's, which will give you detailed info if you can be bothered finding it. Basically its all down to how you drive and if its city or freeway. When my cra was making 200rwkw i was struggling to get over 270km per tank, changed filters, plugs O2 sensor blah blah blah and it went up to about 320. My cra now has 250rwkw and i did a whole tank driving for economy (car only went above 12% inhector duty cycle 2-3 times) and hey presto i got 420km!!!

So as i said its all down to how you drive and the tune, thats if the filters and sensors are operating correctly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...