Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey. im a bit confused after reading the R33 service manual. i did try searching but not mcuh luck sorry.

Could someone maybe point me in the right direction or explain what(if any) the differences are between:

Ignition Timing

Base Timing

Cam Timing

This is regarding R33 s2 25t. erratic idle and possible retarded timing. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212932-difference-between-ign-bt-cam/
Share on other sites

Base Timing & Ignition Timing.

Put simply the ECU adds and subtracts ignition timing from the engine dependent on such things as airflow, throttle position, water temperature, air temperature etc etc etc. It takes your base timing (whatever you have set it to) & then via its function works out the ignition timing. Usually an RB26 has a base timing of 20 degrees. Ignition timing varies widely however. You alter the base timing by moving the crank angle sensor. The ECU alters the ignition timing.

Cam Timing

Cams are phased to align to the crank. So an inlet cam may open say 10 degrees before the crank reaches top dead centre. You can alter the cam timing (with the right parts and or if it is a late model RB via Nissan electrical/oily bits) so the cam may, for example, open at 15 degree BTDC. In other words change the cam timing.

so when we check the timing using the timing light and if the timing is retarded to 10 degrees, what timing is that?

The RB25det should be set to 15degrees timing... is that the base timing?

sorry about the noob questions. im confused so needing advise from others.

so when we check the timing using the timing light and if the timing is retarded to 10 degrees, what timing is that?

The RB25det should be set to 15degrees timing... is that the base timing?

sorry about the noob questions. im confused so needing advise from others.

The 15 degrees is your base timing. They do it in such a way as the ignition advance at idle is your base timing. Which in turn (At idle) will be the same as your ignition timing. They can be the same number.

If it is 5 degrees retarded the car will drive like, well like it is retarded.

When the motor is running you can commonly see thirty to forty degrees ignition timing.

Advice, not advise..... :ermm:

Alright i just did a diagnostic and it came up with Error code 21(2 long flashes and 1 short).

so i turned the ignition off, took keys out and started her up.. let it idle for about 5 mins.. slowly started driving.. and the engine check light would come on for a few secs now and then..

i drove back home.. let it idle.. it went away.. i assume that was the ecu doing its adjustments etc...

i then turned it off.. restarted it and turned it off again.. did a diagnostic and came up all ok(55). Tried that twice.. same thing

alright so i took it for a slow spin at first.. seemed ALOT more responsive and idle is now sitting a rock steady 700 or so.

when i gave it boost, Oh my god... its has NEVER revved this cleanly. 7000rpm came up in a flash. same in 2nd, no traction. shifted into 3rd around 6500 and already 90-100clicks. around 5secs.

Does it all seem okay now? Any advice??

i havent checked timing yet(no tools).

Some good reading I had on me. Apologies, cant remember where i stole it from, so don't sue

Spark Timing Myths Debunked

A widely-held myth is that maximum advance always means maximum power. Here’s what’s wrong with this thinking:

The spark plug ignites the mixture and the fire starts burning. The speed of this flame front depends on the mixture, this means how many air and fuel molecules are packed together in the combustion chamber. The closer they are packed together in the same volume, the easier it is for the fire to jump from one set of molecules to the other. The burning speed is also dependent on the air-fuel-ratio. At about 12.5 to 13 air-fuel-ratio the mixture burns fastest. A leaner mixture than that burns slower. A richer mixture also burns slower. That's why the maximum power mixture is at the fastest burn speed. It takes some time for this flame front to consume all the fuel in the combustion chamber. As it burns, the pressure and temperature in the cylinder increases. This pressure peaks at some point after TDC. Many experiments have shown that the optimum position for this pressure peak is about 15 to 20 degrees after TDC. The exact location of the optimum pressure peak is actually independent of engine load or RPM, but dependent on engine geometry.

Typically all the mixture is burned before about 70 deg ATDC. But because the mixture density and AFR in the engine change all the time, the fire has to be ignited just at the right time to get the peak pressure at the optimal point. As the engine speed increases, you need to ignite the mixture in the combustion chamber earlier because there is less time between spark and optimum peak pressure angle. If the mixture density is changed due to for example boost or higher compression ratio, the spark has to be ignited later to hit the same optimal point.

If the mixture is ignited to early, the piston is still moving up towards TDC as the pressure from the burning mixture builds. This has several effects:

* The pressure buildup before TDC tries to turn the engine backward, costing power.

* The point where the pressure in the cylinder peaks is much closer to TDC, with the result of less mechanical leverage on the crankshaft (less power) and also causes MUCH higher pressure peaks and temperatures, leading to knock.

Many people with aftermarket turbos don't change the spark advance very much, believing that earlier spark creates more power. To combat knock they make the mixture richer. All that happens really then is that the mixture burns slower and therefore hits the peak pressure closer to the right point. This of course reaffirms the belief that the richer mixture creates more power. In reality the flame front speed was adjusted to get the right peak pressure point. The same result (with more power, less emissions and less fuel consumption) could be achieved by leaving the mixture at the leaner optimum and retarding the ignition more instead.

Turbo charging or increasing the compression ratio changes the mixture density (more air and fuel molecules are packed together). This increases the peak pressure and temperature. The pressure and temperature can get so high that the remaining unburned mixture ignites by itself at the hottest part in the combustion chamber. This self-ignition happens explosively and is called 'knock'. All engines knock somewhat. If there is very little unburned mixture remaining when it self-ignites, the explosion of that small amount does not cause any problems because it can't create a large, sharp pressure peak. Igniting the mixture later (retarding) causes the peak pressure to be much lower and cures the knock.

The advances in power of modern engines, despite the lower quality of gasoline today, comes partially from improvements in combustion chamber and spark plug location. Modern engines are optimized so that the flame front has the least distance to travel and consumes the mixture as fast as possible. An already burned mixture can no longer explode and therefore higher compression ratios are possible with lower octane fuel. Some race or high performance engines actually have 2 or three spark plugs to ignite the mixture from multiple points. This is done so that the actual burn time is faster with multiple flame fronts. Again, this is to consume the mixture faster without giving it a chance to self-ignite.

Higher octane fuel is more resistant to self-ignition. It takes a higher temperature and pressure to cause it to burn by itself. That's why race fuels are used for engines with high compression or boost. Lead additives have been used, and are still used to raise the self-ignition threshhold of gasoline, but lead is toxic and therefore no longer used for pump-gas. Of course a blown engine is toxic to your wallet.

gallery_14713_1542_24625.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...