Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

300 RWKW using the GT-RS

I think the one you are thinking of is 'thizzle' he was one of the first guys in AU to get the GT-RS

it was setup at BD4's from memory and it made a touch over 300rwkw with cams and other junk

since then no one else has come close to that mark - im not saying its bullshit or not, but average GT-RS is around 260-270rwkw

there's a few other "high scorers" some that come to mind;

grepin's 2835 setup

thizzles GT-RS setup

again - it doesnt mean the figures are bogus, they are probably legit

but i suspect there some info from the puzzle missing, theres always a reason a car makes more power etc.

you dont make extra power from magic dust or magic tricks.

Interesting discussion guys. I agree with SK that boost isn't what determines horsepower. The formulas are good indications of likely power with standard aftermarket mods, though each car's setup can have so many variables the formulas can't be taken as any more than a guideline.

Certain mods (like cams) will shift an engine's powerband around depending on the setup the owner wants, so this can throw off the calculations as the maximum power at a certain boost pressure will be higher/lower than the same turbo on stock cams. Setups like these would obviously be classified as outliers in graphing power vs boost, so that will automatically distort the formula depending on whether you keep the outliers/disregard them.

There are too many variables to generalise RB25 power levels IMO. But the formulas come very close, closer than an estimate at any extent.

I think your right on the money, i got my 34 dynoed today and i got 240.6kw atw on 15psi. Unfortunately i ran out of fuel as im still waiting on my injectors to come. Ahh well, the gt-rs is a sick turbo, i get full boost at 3200!!!

Hi guys,

I conducted a regression analysis using the output figures and boost ran from the dyno thread relevant to the RB-25 engine with a HKS GT-RS Turbo.

Basically, a regression analysis is a form of statistical modelling that attempts to evaluate the relationship between one variable (Boost - PSI) and another (Power output - RWKW).

This data will help you 'predict' what sort of power you would get if you have an R33 GTS-T (RB-25 engine) with a HKS GT-RS turbo and other supporting mods of course (ie. Front Mount I/C, Full exhaust, Fuel pump etc etc) running the boost of your choice.

Basically, select the amount of boost you wish to run, and look at the corresponding output figure next to it for an estimate of how much power you would be making.

This analysis is ONLY a rough guide, please do no use it as a definite determinant since all cars are individual and differ to one another.

This post should eliminate those repetitive questions such as; 'How much power will I make if I run XX amount of boost with a GT-RS turbo on my R33?'

post-48356-1207094323_thumb.jpg

Cheers!

  • 2 months later...

Nice turbo, just finished tuning a customers car silver SII r33 277rwkw @ 1.1bar which is bit of a suprise as it was bought from the auctions as an unknown.... turns out to be a stolen and recovered jobbie with full whiteline and bilstein handling kit, 555cc injectors, PFC (i had one laying around) and hybrid cooler... and of course a HKS GT-RS

it is almost identical in response to a 8cm T67 kit i did for a customer awhile back but is a little short on top end.

interesting topic...

i just got my car back today with a 2835 pro s (.68) and its making 265 @ 19psi ... click for more detail

bombtrack has a neo gtt with EXACTLY the same mods as me but with tomei cams and will be getting his done soon on the same dyno / tuner

will post results when it happens

Wow at only 1.1bar? That's pretty impressive. Why didn't u run a bit more boost through it, surely it would have still made a bit more power at around 1.3bar...

Yeah, the customer asked for the best result i could get a 1.1bar so i did what i could, it definately would run bigger numbers easily but he's happy :D

there's a few other "high scorers" some that come to mind;

grepin's 2835 setup

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/30...es-t151839.html

thizzles GT-RS setup

I just looked at the dyno chart in that Grepin thread... 322rwkw with sub 10:9 air fuel ratios!?! something not quite right there

would love to get 300rwkw out of the 2835... pointless on the street but would be heaps of fun on the track... I don't think it would quite get there tho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
×
×
  • Create New...