Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Am going for a set of 235/40/18 and 265/35/18 tyres and have a few choices:

- Falken FK452

- Bridge. RE001 Adrenalin

- Kumho KU31 Ecsta SPT

In the 235 size, Falkens are $215 each, Re001 $295 and KU31 $150

There are the Michelin Pilot Sports 2, Pirelli P Zero Nero, Continental Sport Contact 2, Dunlop Sport Maxx, Yoko. Advan Sport, and Bridge. 050 040 variety, but they are easily at at the $350+, even worse for the 265 size I dare say.

The FK452 from all reports have been fantastic, ranking an overall 3rd with the Dunlop Sport Maxx. I'd use the RE001 but seeing as there is alot of hype (dont know how believable) about them, and feel that the Kumho's may be fairly under par with the FK452's.

What are peoples experiences of the FK452 like? they seem like the best bang for buck high performance out there.

(Not willing to try Nankangs, Linglongs, Federals, ABC's, XYZ's or anything hehe)

The sticky tyre thread was helpful, but want more detail on FK452 experiences.

Thanks!!

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just had some 452s fitted last weekend... 265/40/17 on the rear....Have only done 200km on them but so far they have been awesome and are still green...Traction is way higher than what I had beforehand...255/40 Yokohama ES100s but they were very tired...

Falken 452s get my vote!!...Btw I paid $290 a tyre from Tempe tires...Could have got them cheaper if I went 255 but I wanted 265...

Thanks for letting me know what you used previously, helps with the comparison. I used the superseeded FK451's and they are pretty impressive.

265/40 is an rarer size so possibly explains the price increase. 265/35/18s were quoted at 260-270 each.

i have been in the hills two days in a row in some pretty f**ked storms with re001's. nuff said :thumbsup:

nankangs = death.

In all seriousness, i paid 860 for 4 225/50/16's, and glad i did. Great in the wet/dry, brake's well, grips really nicely when being 'spirited', i ran out of balls before they let go, they few times i've had them on the limit they haven't scared me. 15000km on them so far, i am hoping for 25thou minimum.

I've run 451s and 452s over the years. Anytime I try something else I end up going back to the falkens - can't beat the performance for their price.

currently running them on the stagea in 245/45/17 and on the rear of the 350z

Only thing I am worried about is that Falkens are known to offer great grip initially, but as the tyre wears, the grip also follows until you're left with a crap tyre, is this the case with the Fk452's?

Only brand of tyre I know that keeps their grip all the way through are Michelins, but theyre just too expensive! hehe

my 2c cheap tyres = ceap tyres = DEATH

I HAD A SET OF THESE ON MY R32

THEY WOULD LOSE GRIP MID CORNER WITH NO DRIVE LOAD IN THE WET DAM DANGEROUS

MIND YOU BEFORE THESE I HAD YOKAHAMA V102 AND THEY WERE f**kING AWESOME

I NOW HAVE V103 YOKAHAMA EVEN BETTER IN THE RAIN AGAIN

BUT 102 BETTER IN THE DRY I THINK

no the grip is fine to the end. they do wear quickly

neo32 I think you might be confusing the fk452 with ze326. any brand of tyres has a range of price and performance, and I agree, the 326 are among the least grippy tyres I've ever used.

  • 2 months later...

i'm looking for some of these tyres at the moment as well. can anyone recommend a place in south east melbourne that has good prices on these?

FK452 in 265/35/18. Lowest I've found so far is $349 per tyre.

I'm considering either these or the Bridgestone Adrenalin's RE001, which are about $420 per tyre...

265/40 is an rarer size so possibly explains the price increase. 265/35/18s were quoted at 260-270 each.

This is just the thread I need :happy: I rang around about 10 places yesterday for prices on these here in melbourne, for a 255/40R17 the lowest I was quoted was $320 each. I popped into a place round the corner from work this arvo just to inquire about prices in a variety of sizes for these tyres, for 265/35R18 I was quoted $345 could probably find them 10-15 bucks cheaper from other places but no where near what you said tempe are quoting. For that price it would be worth me buying them from tempe and having them sent down here! Interesting to see though there is minimal difference between the prices of the 17/18" tyres. Think I might have to buy some 18's with the old tax return :ermm:

I run FK452s and I quite like them. I came off RT215s so, when I first got them, they felt very loose, but after driving other peoples' cars I've realised that they perform really well for the money.

They're also the only affordable tyres that come in my size (285/35 R18), but I'd get them even if I had more options.

I run FK452s and I quite like them. I came off RT215s so, when I first got them, they felt very loose, but after driving other peoples' cars I've realised that they perform really well for the money.

They're also the only affordable tyres that come in my size (285/35 R18), but I'd get them even if I had more options.

how much are the FK452s in 285/35/18? I've got 285s on my car all round at the moment, but they're Sumitomo's (approx $390 to $400 per tire at that size)

I was going for smaller tires this time to hopefully get better performance/grip even though it's slightly slimmer tires.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...