Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Am going for a set of 235/40/18 and 265/35/18 tyres and have a few choices:

- Falken FK452

- Bridge. RE001 Adrenalin

- Kumho KU31 Ecsta SPT

In the 235 size, Falkens are $215 each, Re001 $295 and KU31 $150

There are the Michelin Pilot Sports 2, Pirelli P Zero Nero, Continental Sport Contact 2, Dunlop Sport Maxx, Yoko. Advan Sport, and Bridge. 050 040 variety, but they are easily at at the $350+, even worse for the 265 size I dare say.

The FK452 from all reports have been fantastic, ranking an overall 3rd with the Dunlop Sport Maxx. I'd use the RE001 but seeing as there is alot of hype (dont know how believable) about them, and feel that the Kumho's may be fairly under par with the FK452's.

What are peoples experiences of the FK452 like? they seem like the best bang for buck high performance out there.

(Not willing to try Nankangs, Linglongs, Federals, ABC's, XYZ's or anything hehe)

The sticky tyre thread was helpful, but want more detail on FK452 experiences.

Thanks!!

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just had some 452s fitted last weekend... 265/40/17 on the rear....Have only done 200km on them but so far they have been awesome and are still green...Traction is way higher than what I had beforehand...255/40 Yokohama ES100s but they were very tired...

Falken 452s get my vote!!...Btw I paid $290 a tyre from Tempe tires...Could have got them cheaper if I went 255 but I wanted 265...

Thanks for letting me know what you used previously, helps with the comparison. I used the superseeded FK451's and they are pretty impressive.

265/40 is an rarer size so possibly explains the price increase. 265/35/18s were quoted at 260-270 each.

i have been in the hills two days in a row in some pretty f**ked storms with re001's. nuff said :thumbsup:

nankangs = death.

In all seriousness, i paid 860 for 4 225/50/16's, and glad i did. Great in the wet/dry, brake's well, grips really nicely when being 'spirited', i ran out of balls before they let go, they few times i've had them on the limit they haven't scared me. 15000km on them so far, i am hoping for 25thou minimum.

I've run 451s and 452s over the years. Anytime I try something else I end up going back to the falkens - can't beat the performance for their price.

currently running them on the stagea in 245/45/17 and on the rear of the 350z

Only thing I am worried about is that Falkens are known to offer great grip initially, but as the tyre wears, the grip also follows until you're left with a crap tyre, is this the case with the Fk452's?

Only brand of tyre I know that keeps their grip all the way through are Michelins, but theyre just too expensive! hehe

my 2c cheap tyres = ceap tyres = DEATH

I HAD A SET OF THESE ON MY R32

THEY WOULD LOSE GRIP MID CORNER WITH NO DRIVE LOAD IN THE WET DAM DANGEROUS

MIND YOU BEFORE THESE I HAD YOKAHAMA V102 AND THEY WERE f**kING AWESOME

I NOW HAVE V103 YOKAHAMA EVEN BETTER IN THE RAIN AGAIN

BUT 102 BETTER IN THE DRY I THINK

no the grip is fine to the end. they do wear quickly

neo32 I think you might be confusing the fk452 with ze326. any brand of tyres has a range of price and performance, and I agree, the 326 are among the least grippy tyres I've ever used.

  • 2 months later...

i'm looking for some of these tyres at the moment as well. can anyone recommend a place in south east melbourne that has good prices on these?

FK452 in 265/35/18. Lowest I've found so far is $349 per tyre.

I'm considering either these or the Bridgestone Adrenalin's RE001, which are about $420 per tyre...

265/40 is an rarer size so possibly explains the price increase. 265/35/18s were quoted at 260-270 each.

This is just the thread I need :happy: I rang around about 10 places yesterday for prices on these here in melbourne, for a 255/40R17 the lowest I was quoted was $320 each. I popped into a place round the corner from work this arvo just to inquire about prices in a variety of sizes for these tyres, for 265/35R18 I was quoted $345 could probably find them 10-15 bucks cheaper from other places but no where near what you said tempe are quoting. For that price it would be worth me buying them from tempe and having them sent down here! Interesting to see though there is minimal difference between the prices of the 17/18" tyres. Think I might have to buy some 18's with the old tax return :ermm:

I run FK452s and I quite like them. I came off RT215s so, when I first got them, they felt very loose, but after driving other peoples' cars I've realised that they perform really well for the money.

They're also the only affordable tyres that come in my size (285/35 R18), but I'd get them even if I had more options.

I run FK452s and I quite like them. I came off RT215s so, when I first got them, they felt very loose, but after driving other peoples' cars I've realised that they perform really well for the money.

They're also the only affordable tyres that come in my size (285/35 R18), but I'd get them even if I had more options.

how much are the FK452s in 285/35/18? I've got 285s on my car all round at the moment, but they're Sumitomo's (approx $390 to $400 per tire at that size)

I was going for smaller tires this time to hopefully get better performance/grip even though it's slightly slimmer tires.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...