Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NS is back on now!

Im thinking it was someone who was pissed off about NS expanding and becoming hardtuned, and having a section "GTR owners club (GTROC)." Maybe they thought it was trying to muscle in on SAU?

They are basically trying to muscle in on every major car forum, I'm not surprised there are a few people who would be a little peeved off. Although the hacker is from SAU, then it's giving us a pretty bad name.

But hey, when money calls, you gotta answer regardless of who you piss off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778895
Share on other sites

They are basically trying to muscle in on every major car forum, I'm not surprised there are a few people who would be a little peeved off. Although the hacker is from SAU, then it's giving us a pretty bad name.

But hey, when money calls, you gotta answer regardless of who you piss off.

I dont think many people are going to take it to seriously (except loz i assume).

OMGZ FORUM WARZZZ!!!11one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778906
Share on other sites

I think most of these forums aren't worried as hey have their own little group they are comfortable and won't deviate regardless. I mean, you are not going to go to hardtuned for serious advice on rotary advice would you?

But some one out there sure is pissed off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3778921
Share on other sites

vs.jpg

Pre-match specs:

SAU:

Currently:

147 guests, 365 members, 11 anonymous members

Overall:

Our members have made a total of 3,718,974 posts

We have 39,990 registered members

Most users ever online was 900 on 25 May 2006, 04:14 PM

NS:

Currently:

286 guests, 188 members, 3 anonymous members

Overall:

Our members have made a total of 1,754,372 posts

We have 38,882 registered members

Most users ever online was 624 on Mar 3 2008, 07:53 PM

Edited by gravy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3779359
Share on other sites

lol

oh noes forums warzzzz!?!?!1?!?!1ty

I dont get why you'd go to this new skyline or car site that ns has tried to do....man all the history, tech info is here!!!

doesnt make sence...just money making....ah well!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/214009-nscom-haxored/#findComment-3779429
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...