Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Jus like the topic said, by it i mean look wise (the way itll look in the bay), performance, economy etc. And if lets say u had a 34 gtr engine in a 32 and vice versa would it mean u would have to use 34 drivetrain parts in a converted 32 (i mean R34 gtt drivetrain parts as i believe gtr parts would cost too much $$$, so the car ends up being rwd)

Cheers

Looks wise, providing the engines are in the same condition, look similar but each model recieves updated parts.

So i guess yes, its the same block, but they recieve new better, and bigger parts in what the JAPs thought would improve the newer models. which it has. :blink:

Im no expert by any means. Im sure someone will know on here all the different updates however a search on the forum may help you

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

im just askin for a mate of mine who owns a 32 and is lookin at a certain 34 GTR engine, could he just run the normal Gtst's drivetrain with the gtr engine or......???

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

How come in magazines when they all compete against each other over a quarter mile in STOCK form, the 32 Beats the other by only points of a second yet the 34 has over 60 Kw more power?????

gentlemans law champ. Ask urself - why would all japanese performance cars produced by nissan toyota honda etc all run exactly 206kw? truth is - they dont!

No shiet. I was just curious as to where ZENNON got his figures from since the gentlemens law was in place. Meaning Nissan would never have released figures like that.

The figures are obviously rubbish. How does the gentlemens law be in place but yet he has stated 186kw for an r32? The conversion factors are wrong, not to mention it is impossible for those figures to be at wheels figures.

As far as I know the r34 rb26 did not put out 60kw more than the r32 rb26 :(

Edited by Yawn
R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Ummm, I wouldnt put much faith in those numbers. My 32 GTR has only a turbo back exhaust, boost restrictor removed and might have been tuned in japan (its still stock ecu though) and makes over 200kw at all 4 wheels... which when you convert to power at the engine would be up towards 300kw... and i dont think those very limited modifications would add over 110kw.

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Why is the R32 measured in HP and the rest in PS?

186 kW sounds about right. SAU member gtrzillar had his Stock GTR R32 dyno at RE Customs at the Dyno Day, 1st March 08, he hit 185.5 kW at all four wheels with a shitty compliance cat at the time.

I read the GTR R32 makes about 243 kW at the flywheel = 325 HP = 330 PS.

Mind you, the car loses about 20-25% power through the drivetrain as I have been told. (Clarification needed)

"While the published figures from Nissan were quoted as 206 kW (276hp), practical tests showed the car had a factory power output of closer to 330 PS (325 hp) at the flywheel. The lower published figure was Nissan's response to the need to abide by a gentleman's agreement between the Japanese auto manufacturers not to release a car to the public exceeding 280 PS (276 hp) of power output."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyline_gtr

This power output should be the same for all the GTR R32, R33 and R34

I can only expect the power to hit 260 kW 350 HP at the flywheel if it was the R34 GTR N1 engine = V-Spec II Nür and R34 M-spec Nür models due to their twin turbos running 1.1 Bar Boost.

Big diferences am afraid..!!

On the side of the block look for things in the format of 6U, 24U etc.

Engine wise there is a diff tho, power-wise, they were held back. The "Gentlemanly power Rule" applies here.

certain xxU engines have better oilways, cooling, stress relief and strenghtening inside them. 24U..!!!

Look for real N1, see what it has on it, should be matching numbers.

Effectively the same power, but its how far you can push them is the major factor here. IF you can get a genuine first N1 motor..ie mine, then it is a bl@@dy strong motor, and can be pushed without all the add-ons... I know, I done it, and its still strong.

There are obvious casting revisions, like chamferings etc, but the crux is in the inside. 24U is the one you aim for. ask a race tuner that knows his stuff.

In answer to "Styline GTR's" point.

The 34GTR had a smaller compressor, so run out of steam when pushed, as the compressor cant flow anymore without being a restriction.

Oh, and weight is another, the 34 is supposedly more of a lump. Changed from 'Race bred' to 'Commuter bred' along the way!!

Edited by Richieb

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...