Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Jus like the topic said, by it i mean look wise (the way itll look in the bay), performance, economy etc. And if lets say u had a 34 gtr engine in a 32 and vice versa would it mean u would have to use 34 drivetrain parts in a converted 32 (i mean R34 gtt drivetrain parts as i believe gtr parts would cost too much $$$, so the car ends up being rwd)

Cheers

Looks wise, providing the engines are in the same condition, look similar but each model recieves updated parts.

So i guess yes, its the same block, but they recieve new better, and bigger parts in what the JAPs thought would improve the newer models. which it has. :blink:

Im no expert by any means. Im sure someone will know on here all the different updates however a search on the forum may help you

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

im just askin for a mate of mine who owns a 32 and is lookin at a certain 34 GTR engine, could he just run the normal Gtst's drivetrain with the gtr engine or......???

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

How come in magazines when they all compete against each other over a quarter mile in STOCK form, the 32 Beats the other by only points of a second yet the 34 has over 60 Kw more power?????

gentlemans law champ. Ask urself - why would all japanese performance cars produced by nissan toyota honda etc all run exactly 206kw? truth is - they dont!

No shiet. I was just curious as to where ZENNON got his figures from since the gentlemens law was in place. Meaning Nissan would never have released figures like that.

The figures are obviously rubbish. How does the gentlemens law be in place but yet he has stated 186kw for an r32? The conversion factors are wrong, not to mention it is impossible for those figures to be at wheels figures.

As far as I know the r34 rb26 did not put out 60kw more than the r32 rb26 :(

Edited by Yawn
R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Ummm, I wouldnt put much faith in those numbers. My 32 GTR has only a turbo back exhaust, boost restrictor removed and might have been tuned in japan (its still stock ecu though) and makes over 200kw at all 4 wheels... which when you convert to power at the engine would be up towards 300kw... and i dont think those very limited modifications would add over 110kw.

R34 RB26DETT > R33 RB26DETT > R32 RB26DETT

R32 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (186 kW, 368 N m)

R33 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 305 PS (224 kW, 375 N m)

R34 GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 332 PS (244 kW, 392 N m)

ps. what are you actually thinking of doing? putting gtr34 parts in r32??

maybe tell us what you are thinking of doing..

Why is the R32 measured in HP and the rest in PS?

186 kW sounds about right. SAU member gtrzillar had his Stock GTR R32 dyno at RE Customs at the Dyno Day, 1st March 08, he hit 185.5 kW at all four wheels with a shitty compliance cat at the time.

I read the GTR R32 makes about 243 kW at the flywheel = 325 HP = 330 PS.

Mind you, the car loses about 20-25% power through the drivetrain as I have been told. (Clarification needed)

"While the published figures from Nissan were quoted as 206 kW (276hp), practical tests showed the car had a factory power output of closer to 330 PS (325 hp) at the flywheel. The lower published figure was Nissan's response to the need to abide by a gentleman's agreement between the Japanese auto manufacturers not to release a car to the public exceeding 280 PS (276 hp) of power output."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyline_gtr

This power output should be the same for all the GTR R32, R33 and R34

I can only expect the power to hit 260 kW 350 HP at the flywheel if it was the R34 GTR N1 engine = V-Spec II Nür and R34 M-spec Nür models due to their twin turbos running 1.1 Bar Boost.

Big diferences am afraid..!!

On the side of the block look for things in the format of 6U, 24U etc.

Engine wise there is a diff tho, power-wise, they were held back. The "Gentlemanly power Rule" applies here.

certain xxU engines have better oilways, cooling, stress relief and strenghtening inside them. 24U..!!!

Look for real N1, see what it has on it, should be matching numbers.

Effectively the same power, but its how far you can push them is the major factor here. IF you can get a genuine first N1 motor..ie mine, then it is a bl@@dy strong motor, and can be pushed without all the add-ons... I know, I done it, and its still strong.

There are obvious casting revisions, like chamferings etc, but the crux is in the inside. 24U is the one you aim for. ask a race tuner that knows his stuff.

In answer to "Styline GTR's" point.

The 34GTR had a smaller compressor, so run out of steam when pushed, as the compressor cant flow anymore without being a restriction.

Oh, and weight is another, the 34 is supposedly more of a lump. Changed from 'Race bred' to 'Commuter bred' along the way!!

Edited by Richieb

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's not a transistor --- it's marked ZD1 which makes it a zener diode. As to what the breakdown voltage is, not enough there to divine.
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
×
×
  • Create New...