Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

May not make a world of difference but didn't stop the Bathurst gtr guys from insulating what they could...

Yeah i think it'd make a *slight* improvement in an engine bay that can melt arctic glaciers :blink:

Edited by R338OY

Isnt that the point though?

How much money do we throw at our engines and cars for gains? Exhaust maybe gets you 10-20rwkw extra (everything else being standard) and I know i spent over $1200 on my Trust system....

If $20 gets you an extra .5rwkw or even less, i think its worth it....

Edited by nuclear_skyline
May not make a world of difference but didn’t stop the Bathurst gtr guys from insulating what they could...

1,000k's of flat out driving where every single horsepower counts is a little different to driving to work in the traffic ;)

Cheers

Gary

I was thinking about your example SydneyKid..

i think you made a strong point.. but after thinking more about it.. i think there is more to it.

The pipe before the intercooler gets REALLY stinking hot after a good hit of boost.. y? The hot air may only see a small part of the pipe for 0.2 seconds.. but, as a whole function of the boost episode, that one peice of pipe 'see's' lots of hot air for the 5~10 seconds during that boost hit.

So, I think it stands to some reason that when you are cruising, the pipe that returns the cooler air from the intercooler has a chance to warm up as it travels past the radiator on its way to the engine. The air is in a generally slow flow mode at cruise, under no pressure and has ample time to absorb heat from the pipe as the air is cooler than the pipework..

This is why i think i felt a 'seat of the pants' better throttle responce going from cruise onto boost. I think that is why i cant 'feel' any difference on boost. I think you are spot on with your thoughts when the car is on boost, but on cruise i think it works backwards..

What i do know.. my cheap-ass stubby coolers have been there for ages.. and i aint taking them off!

thoughts?

hey for the amount of money spent and if you can feel a bit of difference, im all for it.

did you wrap up all the pipings or just the intercooler outlet to throttle?

if compressed air coming out of turbo is hotter than under bonnet air temperature (i don't know if it is, or it is only after certain boost level, but anyway), maybe pre-intercooler piping should be left alone.

Ok, the drive home, highway plus urban driving (different from my way in).

BTW, pre intercooler pipe as mentioned above was not insulated, I didn't consider it necessary as it gets pretty hot, especially on boost, 12psi probably gets the air to 60 or 70 C.

Results:

Definite gain at low engine speeds, part throttle cruise, and building boost.

Full Boost: Doesn't seem any quicker, although I'd think there would have to be a pretty big gain to notice anything here, unless dyno runs were done.

Car felt perkier/more responsive when cruising and tackling hills in 4th and 5th gear, pulled better from first throttle application and low boost loads (just into positive pressure).

All in all, psi is right (and I'm not the first to do the beer cooler idea), and as other guys have said, this best effect is when air speed is slow for obvious reasons (air has more time to heat up).

Fixxxer

I was thinking about your example SydneyKid..

i think you made a strong point.. but after thinking more about it.. i think there is more to it.

The pipe before the intercooler gets REALLY stinking hot after a good hit of boost.. y? The hot air may only see a small part of the pipe for 0.2 seconds.. but, as a whole function of the boost episode, that one peice of pipe 'see's' lots of hot air for the 5~10 seconds during that boost hit.

So, I think it stands to some reason that when you are cruising, the pipe that returns the cooler air from the intercooler has a chance to warm up as it travels past the radiator on its way to the engine. The air is in a generally slow flow mode at cruise, under no pressure and has ample time to absorb heat from the pipe as the air is cooler than the pipework..

This is why i think i felt a 'seat of the pants' better throttle responce going from cruise onto boost. I think that is why i cant 'feel' any difference on boost. I think you are spot on with your thoughts when the car is on boost, but on cruise i think it works backwards..

What i do know.. my cheap-ass stubby coolers have been there for ages.. and i aint taking them off!

thoughts?

I thought we were talkng about the post intercooler pipework? Now we are talking about the pre-intercooler pipework, which has some rather interesting differences. Insulating that is pretty much guaranteed to do nothing at all because the turbo on boost produces quite hot air flow inside the pipework, after all that's why you need an intercooler. So the temperature difference, inside the pipework compared to outside, is not anywhere near as great. Since the temperature difference isn't as great, there is very little transfer of heat, even at slow airspeeds.

But wait there's more (of course) the intercooler removes some of that difference. An average intercooler is around 70% efficient (at removing termperature), so even if the uninsulated pipework adds a few degrees the intercooler will remove 70% of the difference to ambient anyway.

Back to the post intercooler pipework, I only ever use the 120 degree at the throttle body style of pipework on RB20/25's, so I don't have the extra length behind the radiator. That's a win/win as the lesser amount of air in the pipework improves the response, probably more than taking (at best) a couple of degrees out of the air temperature. That's a true not cost benefit, get the right pipework the first time.

Similarly a heat shield around a pod that lowers the inlet temperature by upwards of 40 degrees is a must. That you can truly feel, compared to a couple of degrees which is more likely to be placebo effect.

Cheers

Gary

Hmm im with SK on this matter. Id go with best bet cool the charge before it enters the turbo will net you a better result. Pod mounted in guard. Boxed off with CAI would be a far better and achievable goal to go for then the insulating. Why the hell not do a test put a couple of temp probes in after IC and before TB then test results. That will be the confirmation of all. esp when you said you feel the difference. but is it a placebo thing. Expecting to feel a difference so you think it doest make a difference??

Very sceptical on this for sure but you know where im coming from. Or how bout looking at Ceramic coating or some heat wrap that some do to manifolds and pipes and housings. at least you underbonnet temps should be down as well..

But well done for trying

Cheers

the autospeed article has the figures - altho it only measured air temp at throttle body not at i/c outlet, i think the results are there, assuming the autospeed experiment had robust process in terms of ambient and driving conditions (i don't know if it was), there shouldn't be any arguments here.

even better Fixxxer could tell the difference.

placebo effect is definitely a possibility, but then what can you do, do a blind testing?

as for saving time & money and buy a mod that is proven to work - all for it too.

but i don't think Fixxxer would have saved enough time & money to be able to buy any decent mods.

plus i think some people just like tinkering with little things like that rather than just go out and buy stuff.

i, for one, find it more fun.

Tinkering is what I'm good at....

I did the mod cause I had time, it didn't cost practically anything, and there is NO possible way the mod can reduce power, it can only aid. As mentioned in previous posts, I have noticed a definite increase in response, part throttle cruise and building boost scenarios, on roads I travel every day. I'm not removing it.....

Next mod - shield the pod filter. It already has a cold air feed blowing directly at it but this should help too.

Fixxxer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
    • It says 300ZX, does that make it an Aus delivered car? Funny how back in the day I just couldn't care less about Z32's and these days I am just in love with them. Back when Nissan was into pushing the envelope. 🤣
    • Hi guys, just after some guidance with an R34 sunroof that has stopped working correctly. It still opens and closes perfectly fine, but it no longer tilts/vents up or down. As a result, the rear of the glass now sags a bit as it drops down slightly in order to retract into the roof, but now it can't pop upwards into a flush position. I’ve probed the pins on the back of the switch connector with a multimeter and it seems like both switches (for open/close and tilt/vent) still work correctly. Any ideas on what it could be, or where I should even start in terms of diagnosing? I'm sure someone's had this issue before but I haven't been able to find anything online relating to this specific issue, most of the issues are with the seals leaking or the motor failing entirely. Thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...