Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From what ive read on these forums, people talk about how they have such and such a power rating on the dyno, but then on the track, run slower times that the guy next to them with the same mods (or less).

Should a cars performance be rated by how much power it produces on a dyno, how it peforms down the 1/4... or what makes more sence the g-forces of the car accelerating through a particular gear???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21551-measuring-performance/
Share on other sites

i know what your saying and dont understand it fully either. Lets say u got three r33 gtst's 1- 209hp 13.8@101

2- 250hp 14.0@100

3- 230hp 13.9@101

Thats as an example and there are many like that on here. Cars of the same make with more hp getting slower times than less hp cars of the same make. Does that come down to driver?? Tyre pressures?? General setup of the car?

There's many different aspects to performance, and these depend on what you're looking for. If you're after 1/4 mile times, then you mightn't be as worried about handling as a guy who likes to drift, you mightn't be as worried about power as suspension set up. Or you might just be a dyno whore who wants a big turbo to put out big hp readings on the dyno.

I think it all depends on what you want out of the car, to each his own i say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
    • I used to do that (sills with rubber jack block).. ... then I got side skirts, and there's no way for the jack to actually work there, the jack pad itself on the jack is too big. Is the answer to use a... smaller (?) jack? Hmmm.
    • I have too much trauma from every skyline I've ever seen having crushed jack points/pinch welds lol.    Yep, works 100%, it's what I use when I'm using the quick jack. Don't know why I can't also bring myself to do the same thing when I'm using a jack. I blame the skyline PTSD. 
×
×
  • Create New...