Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay so I’m starting to crunch some numbers now and I just wanted some opinions on what I was thinking. Basically I’m going to have a built rb30det with a gt35r pushing 22+psi and hopefully pump out 500+awhp.

I’m going to use a NEO head and as most of you know it only has a capacity of 50-51cc compared to the normal rb25 head of 60-64cc, obviously this will raise compression. From what I understand the stock rb30 piston has a compression height of 1.260in with a 0.040 deck height (so the piston sits roughly 1mm below the top of the bore at TDC). I would like to have a zero deck height, and I’m still unsure on what piston size to run, either std 86mm or 87mm because at the end of the day most rb30s out there would of done at least 250,000kms and a hone might not cut it.

So this is what I was thinking:

CP Pistons (8.2 CR in the normal rb25/30)

Piston Compression Height: 1.280

Deck Height: 0 (shave .020 off the block)

Piston volume: 0 (flat tops)

Head gasket thickness: 1.6mm

Head gasket bore: 88mm

Head chamber capacity: 51cc

Bore: 86mm

Stroke: 85mm

According to the calculations that will achieve 9.13: CR, and if I needed to run 87mm pistons that would bump up to 9.32:1 CR which is starting to get a bit high for my likings, but I could drop that down to 8.75 and 8.93 respectively by having a deck height of 0.020in but im not sure how much that would affect the quench.

OR

ACL Race Series Forged RB30ET

Piston Compression Height: 1.261

Deck Height: 0 (shave .040 off the block)

Piston volume: -4.5 (dished)

Head gasket thickness: 1.6mm

Head gasket bore: 88mm

Head chamber capacity: 51cc

Bore: 86mm

Stroke: 85mm

With that combo I would be looking at 8.56:1 CR and with a 87mm bore it would have a 8.72:1 CR. I just don’t have any experience with the ACL pistons, how do they rate compared to CP?

Also I’ve noticed that most aftermarket head gaskets that I’ve seen come with a bore of 88mm, has anyone experienced trouble running a head gasket like that on a 86 or 87mm cylinder bore?

Any input would be great

:3some:

Edited by R34GTFOUR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/215701-rb30-neo-piston-selection/
Share on other sites

Where did you get that info from?

Cheers

Gary

i've read it a few times on the forum, but its also listed in the rb30 PDF guide on here. Spoolup also mentions it on his site www.spoolimports.com that the combustion chamber in the head is smaller, and different pistons need to be used.

Im using the ACL's in a NEO 25/30 im building. Why do you want to run a 1.6mm HG? I would run a 1.0 or 1.2 and higher comp.

Mainly to be a bit more boost friendly, but i just did some quick calculations:

With the 86mm acl pistons it will run close to 8.86:1 CR with a 1.2mm hg and 9.01:1 with a 1mm hg

With the 87mm acl pistons it will run clsoe to 9.04:1 with a 1.2mm hg and 9.20:1 with a 1mm hg

So depending on the condition of the bore (i havent got a block yet) if i run a std piston the 1mm hg seems the go, and with the 87mm piston the 1.2mm hg seems the go

Whats some feedback on acl race series pistons? Anyone heard good/bad things? Anyone know of any high hp cars running them on a daily basis?

:down:

The ACL distributor here told me the ACL race pistons are made by Ross.

As we all know Ross make pretty sharp pistons so i think they look to be a good option.

didnt know that :down:

i can get acl at trade price so that looking better and better

thanks

If your in sydney, you can come and have a look at a set if you like.

nah im in perth cheers anyway, coventrys over here sell them and i can get trade throught them so it should be sweet. I looked at their website and it shows a set, but it has valve reliefs so im not sure if its the correct picture.

Whats the general opinion on running a head gasket bore of 88mm on an engine with a bore of 86-87mm? Is that going to cause a problem? 90% of the gaskets i've seen are 88mm for the rb25/26

mentioned to my workshop from the very get go that the NEO head have smaller cc. But they still went with the cp pistions for a r33 rb25. Dont know what comp ratio its going to end up with or how but i would like around 8.5. Will be whacking 2bar from a t04z.

mentioned to my workshop from the very get go that the NEO head have smaller cc. But they still went with the cp pistions for a r33 rb25. Dont know what comp ratio its going to end up with or how but i would like around 8.5. Will be whacking 2bar from a t04z.

hey mate,

it all depends on wat height they decked your block, your headgasket size etc but regardless i dont think you'll get it down to 8.5:1 CR

The lowest i can see it going it 8.7:1 and thats with no decking wat so ever, running a big 1.6mm headgasket and std size pistons (86mm)

Worst case senario, if they zero decked the block, with a 1mm hg and 87mm pistons your CR would be as high as 9.85, which i wouldnt think the engine would like 2 bar boost that much

Decking your block only increases your compression ratio as you are reducing your piston to deck volume ( if you have one ) and or making your piston sit proud of the deck, hence making your gasket volume smaller.

My NEO head ( from memory ) had 56cc comb chambers.

The ACL distributor here told me the ACL race pistons are made by Ross.

As we all know Ross make pretty sharp pistons so i think they look to be a good option.

they also have a thicker top ring than the CP's, so they form quite a good seal...reducing blow-by.

good piston for the $$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...