Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've had my R33 GTS-T for six months now. I am new to skyline modding. The car has an X-force exhaust and the actuator mod I beleive that is all. A few questions:

1. I plan to buy a SAFC II or SAFC Neo asap. Is this a good option for piggyback? What does the neo offer in the real world that the II does not?

2. I am looking for 200-250rwkw, maybe more in the future. What tuners in the Albury or Melbourne area's tune with SAFC's that you would personally reccomend?

3. What other mods to get to this power range safley other than a safc, clutch and intercooler may I need?

4. My brother has an XR6 Turbo and has the stock intercooler laying around (as hes replaced to get over the 300rwkw mark), will this be any use to me for the lowish power im aiming for?

Thanks for any tips guys.

-Ratnal

Edited by ratnal
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216515-basic-mods/
Share on other sites

1. the SAFC II is a fuel / air piggy back... the SAFC neo does that as well as allowing you to play with timing... which helps alot with turbo upgrades... cheaper option... you wont need this unless ur planning to change ur turbo

2. my mate has rb25 r32, but he at one point dynoed it with stock cept zorst, cooler, power FC and splitfire coilpacks at 210rw kw.. u would want to get a new turbo if u want over 200kw.. stock turbo wont handle more that 12psi hapily... can go further... i ran my r33 turbo on my rb20 r32 up to 17psi and handled it right, but it died quite quickly... ceramic wheel, not so great.. .i would recommend a garret 2530.. great responsive turbo, at the power range ur lookn for

3. clutch cooler and safc is easy way of gettin power.. a good exhaust system does help too. xforce is good.. get urself a dump and front pipe and high flow cat... great way to open up possibilities... a good fuel pump.. bosche 040 around the 330$ mark i think, great for a start.. and def a short shifter..

4. could make that cooler work.. but it does a bit of a bend i think in generall.. can pick up a cooler kit from sponsors for about 350$ mark.. cheap and decent makes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216515-basic-mods/#findComment-3823888
Share on other sites

PFC is a full replacement ECU for the car, SAFC is simply a tool that trick the standard ECU into working properl with the mods you have. PFC is a far better unit but also comes with a higher price tag.

What you will need for 200rwkw-

1. Full exhaust from turbo to tip

2. Boost Control

3. Intercooler (R34 SMIC will be fine for up to 200rwkw, any more get a front mount)

4. Fuel pump

5. Clutch

6. ECU (huge amount of options, TOSHI remap seems very good value and retains the stock computer)

7. Air filter, either pod or upgraded panel

What you will need for 250rwkw-

1. All of the above

2. Z32 AFM

3. Bigger fuel injectors, the S15 480cc's will be fine for this power level.

4. Turbocharger upgrade, look in the rb25det upgrade thread for heaps of info. I'm currently making 249.7kw on 16 psi with a bolt on hi flow, which only cost $1050 second hand with onl a few hundred km's on it.

5. Tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216515-basic-mods/#findComment-3824245
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...