Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It happened to me. The one person who NEVER speaks on the phone while driving!

I got pulled over at around 1am last night cos the cop that came next to me on the freeway saw me holding my phone on my lap. The screen was lit up cos it was playing music.

My deck stopped working so iv just been playing music off my phone when i get really bored of having no sound.

I couldnt be any angrier. I wasn't looking at my phone, wasnt talking on my phone & it was on my bloody lap. It wouldve been 987569859 times more dangerous if i was to take my eyes off the road and adjust my aircon or play with my CD player but i wouldnt have been done for that would I!!

I seriously dont want to drive on the road anymore, crap like this is just a turn off. Because of this im thinking of just unregistering my 33 & using it as a track car only.

Im just really annoyed that this happened to me as iv never spoken on the phone while driving. All my mates are always talking on the phine in full traffic etc and dont get done but i get pulled up for this!

Im fuming.

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/
Share on other sites

i know is sucks and he prolly did pull u over for no reason, but it does happen. The law is 2hands on the steerin wheel. ive been pulled over and the copper actually said to me i have one ticket left, what do you want it for? i took it to court and surprise surprise i lost. but good luck with whatever u do.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843148
Share on other sites

absolute f*** pricks. What annoys me, is I used to think they are more leniant if u treat them with the respect the police officer deserves. But it still makes no difference, they treat u like **** shit. I always speak to em in a nice tone, address them as 'Sir' & never show any sought of cocky attitude or anything.

And u get NOTHING in return.

I spent 3 hours on Grand Theft Auto 4 yesterday shooting police in the head several times & then was kicking em while they were dead on the ground.

Believe it or not that made me feel a better. Think i need to play more tonight...

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843160
Share on other sites

2 hands on the steering wheel when not changing gears...

ring your phone provider and get the phone records... then consult a lawyer that does a free consult... like one of those no win no fee places...

i can see this going down one of 2 ways.... either you take it to court unrepresented but armed with your phone records and you win... convincingly

OR

the cop then states that you must have been on someone else's phone and then it your word vs a copper... NOT GOOD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843208
Share on other sites

i know is sucks and he prolly did pull u over for no reason, but it does happen. The law is 2hands on the steerin wheel. ive been pulled over and the copper actually said to me i have one ticket left, what do you want it for? i took it to court and surprise surprise i lost. but good luck with whatever u do.

ALWAYS have your mobile phone sitting in your door or similar place recording when pulled over...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843220
Share on other sites

absolute f*** pricks. What annoys me, is I used to think they are more leniant if u treat them with the respect the police officer deserves. But it still makes no difference, they treat u like **** shit. I always speak to em in a nice tone, address them as 'Sir' & never show any sought of cocky attitude or anything.

And u get NOTHING in return.

you might not get of from doing this.... but you sure will have an easier time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843224
Share on other sites

What exactly is the phone for??

Is it worded "use of a mobile phone", or "use of a mobile communications device while driving"???

The wording will be the key to getting off or not, if it is alleged that you where using a mobile communications device while driving, then they are quite correct, you WHERE using a mobile communications device. Albeit you where not using it as a communicating device, but you where using it no the less.

If they claim you where talking on your mobile phone, then you have very good grounds to fight the claim, because you where not 'using a mobile phone', you where using a music player.

The other thing is phone records will not prove beyond a doubt that you where not using a mobile phone, because they are 1-way transparent (i.e they show you didn't initiate a call, they dont show if you received a call, as doing so would be against the telecommunications privacy legislation).

B.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843378
Share on other sites

you must tell them thier being recorded to use that as everdence i think you will find.

interesting point... i suppose you could tell them...

but they record you for the same reason and dont mention it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843406
Share on other sites

What does the ticket read?

If it reads using/talking on a moble phone whilst operating a motor vehicle, get your itemised phone account make sure no call is infact logged for the booking time or just previous to the booked time.

Take it to the police station in question and see what they'll do.....if they don't bury it take it to court, it should get thrown out.

Edited by madbung
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843484
Share on other sites

get your itemised phone account make sure no call is infact logged for the booking time or just previous to the booked time.

Take it to the police station in question and see what they'll do.....if they don't bury it take it to court, it should get thrown out.

As already mentioned, this means lick-all, because your itemised call records dont show INCOMMING calls, therefore they will claim the call just have been recieved, the phone was still 'in use' and therefore the infringement sticks.

It sucks, but that's the way life goes.

I was almost done for the same thing, but was given a 'formal caution' on keeping my attention on the road when I was changing tracks on my MP3 player.

Same deal, saw the glowing screen, assumed it was a mobile, got pulled over and I told them I didn't even have a mobile on me at the time, it was an mp3 player.

I was told that if they deemed it as such, the MP3 player could be seen as driving without due care, and attract a neg driving infringement.

They basically have nothing btter to do, and innocent until preven guilty is a crock of shit, you have to PROVE TO THEM your innocent!!

B.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843522
Share on other sites

What exactly is the phone for??

Is it worded "use of a mobile phone", or "use of a mobile communications device while driving"???

The wording will be the key to getting off or not, if it is alleged that you where using a mobile communications device while driving, then they are quite correct, you WHERE using a mobile communications device. Albeit you where not using it as a communicating device, but you where using it no the less.

If they claim you where talking on your mobile phone, then you have very good grounds to fight the claim, because you where not 'using a mobile phone', you where using a music player.

The other thing is phone records will not prove beyond a doubt that you where not using a mobile phone, because they are 1-way transparent (i.e they show you didn't initiate a call, they dont show if you received a call, as doing so would be against the telecommunications privacy legislation).

B.

Several factors may negate this argument.

Was the offence in NSW.

Was the driver provisional P1 licence holder.

If this were the case then it is an offence for a P1 licence holder to operate any function of a mobile phone in a car in NSW even if it is not in their hands.

Secondly, case law was introduced in about 2005 statign that any communications function is "using". There was recently amended again to cover any function a phone does, and not just communication. You best argument is whether you were holding the phone, but you already said you were holding it in your lap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3843853
Share on other sites

Cop it on the chin hey, bit unlucky but as far as the law is concerned you were in the wrong. Good luck contesting it.

Either way, my opinion bit dangerous having it sitting on your lap while driving don't you think? Its interesting what peoples bodies do in emergencys, and I can tell you now having a phone sitting on your lap playing music isnt good.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3844115
Share on other sites

Either way, my opinion bit dangerous having it sitting on your lap while driving don't you think? Its interesting what peoples bodies do in emergencys, and I can tell you now having a phone sitting on your lap playing music isnt good.

Not too mention what the radiation is doin to your balls! :blink:

That sucks Dean, tough luck. I bet you won't think twice about using your mobile phone while driving in the future, I mean why not, so this cop has effectively caused a potential problem on the road rather than solving one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3846786
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure the Vic laws wording is along the lines of not operating a mobile phone

So technically that would tell me that you are indeed using/operating it.

It doesn’t matter if your changing the time, turning it on silent or calling someone - your still 'operating' it.

Sucks yes.

Is it the law? Yes.

I'd check the wording etc with a lawyer, but depending on that wording will determine if you have a case or you've shot yourself in the foot

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217769-lost-3-points/#findComment-3846836
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...