Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Ive noticed today the the gauge that shows the Front Diff Torque has started to move during normal straight line driving and the more i put my foot down the higher the gauge will go.

Usually the gauge only moved when i turned a corner quick i think, but never during straight line driving.

Which one is normal!

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217829-r32-gtr-front-diff-torque/
Share on other sites

I think i may have found the answer to my own question.

Is it because I have 17" wheel all round and the tyres i have are 255/40 on the rear and 235/45 at the front?

I recently changed wheels and these were the tyres that came with it.

Does this have a negative effect at all?

Also, the car came with a torque split controller...

Definitely get same rolling diameter tires front and rear, otherwise one set of wheels are technically trying to travel a greater distance then the other set of wheels, the attesa thinks you have slip and engages 4wd, doing so constantly overheats and wears out the clutch plates in the transfer case

Yes.. You will loose ABS

in the fuse box in the engine bay.. on the left as you open up the bonnet.. the fise said something like ANTI/4WD/PTC.. or of the sorts.. its the first green fuse in the row of small fuses towards the center of the thengine bay.. This way you wont loose abs..

You can run different sized tyres front and rear as long as the rolling diameter is the same (or close to). An example of this would be something like 265/35/18 and 235/40/18, if my maths is correct.

No good to run the car on 2wd for too long with just the fuse pulled out too. If you want to do it rwd, take out the transfer case too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...