Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering what people do when they are coming up to a stop light and anticipate stopping there for a minute.

Downshift or brake to idle rpm and then coast in neutral (what I'm doing now). Basically I figured that clutches are more expensive than brake pads.

Also I have heard differing things regarding skipping gears on downshifts putting more strain on your transmission? I thought that as long as the revs fall within your safe range for the gear you intend to go into, it shouldn't matter how many gears you skip. Is this true or not?

Thanks.

Edited by Phatboy
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Half half really, depends how lazy I am !!

Although since the new engine went in, its usually neutral........

I've been told the skipping gears going up can be bad for the box (synchros) .... not sure re downshift though.... assuming prolly the same. This could be a complete load of crap though...?!?

yer i usually down shift but thats how i was taught to drive i think lol

cant remember who said it but i think someone said to downshift coz u save ur brakes so u dnt have to change em as often but meh

Coast up to the stop, with system in gear (no need to down change) until it requires the clutch being disengaged.

There is no wear in the clutch while it is fully engaged. The wear occurs on "take-up" from a standing start, because you need to slip it a bit as it engages and transfers power to the gearbox. And there should be minimal wear in the brakes, because most of the stopping is achieved by friction in the drivetrain.

I heard that there was wear in the clutch when fully engaged even when not changing gears, and that's the reason why you shouldn't coast with it depressed, instead put it in neutral. May be wrong, just what I heard from a few people.

It depends on distance to the lights when they change.

If I'm close, then clutch in and brake.

If far away, I downshift through the gears to second but use rev matching to minimise/eliminate clutch and synchro wear. (Needs a longer space to slow down than dropping the revs to idle and braking with clutch)

i double clutch, heal toe or flick it into neutral, skip gears sometimes as well, depends what mood i'm in really

i got taught to use the brakes when slowing down cos gearboxs cost more then brakes

Well the way I see it:

Downshifting.

Pros:

1. You have more control of the car, can accelerate quickly if needed.

2. It sounds better

Cons:

1. More wear/tear on clutch/synchros

2. If you engine brake without hitting the brakes, the guy behind you may not have noticed you have slowed down as your brake lights haven't lighted up.

The pros/cons of neutral would be the opposite obviously.

When I first started driving I would downshift coming up to a stop but only because it felt more controlled and it sounds cool too.

But then I got lazy and also figured the thing about brakepads & clutch wear and just coasted until just before the car needs more revs and neutraled it.

Edit: ^^ agree with the guy above in regards to when you engine brake, people behind you can't see you slowing down as easily.

Many years ago I was taught to downshift and brake...The reason behind it is when the car is in gear you have more control over the car with engine braking ect, coasting less control. If you've ever driven anything heavy like a fully laden truck you'd never consider coasting.

Also i'm on year 4 with both brakes and clutch on this car(app 42k on em), so I won't be changing my driving style....also sounds cooler :blink:

The cost of a decent h-d clutch, compared to h-d pads and quality rotors? who'd like to call that one? :blush:

We could also throw in the occasional calliper rebuild or 2 just bump cost a bit..

Clutch plus install is about $1-1.5k I thought.

Stockish brake pads are like what, $200 a set? Rotors are about $600-800 a set? But you wouldn't need to replace your rotors unless you do a lot of hard braking and they warped would you? ie., track use. In that case you would need to replace your clutch before anything else anyway.

I don't intend to do much track driving, and brake pads should last around 30k I think, so I am happy to sacrifice them rather than my clutch. And I'm too lazy to downshift (main reason) :blush: My clutch has been changed about 1 year ago to a Nismo copper twin plate clutch, so I think with my driving style it should last many many years to come.

If it's wet I put the clutch in and rip the handbrake on then hold the car at a 45 degree angle as I approach the lights. Tyres don't wear in the wet, and since the rears are locked and I'm not on the pedal I'm not using any brakes at all!

(I'm not serious, btw)

normally downshift at least to 3rd, and coast in-gear until i need to put the clutch in. it's better to be in gear, you'll get docked during a driving test if you neutral + coast, because if something happens and you need to put your foot down you're going to get a whole lot of revs and not much else.

I think its illegal to roll in neutral (in victoria)..

What i do is just stay in gear as im coming up to the lights and clutch in as soon as the car comes to a stop. By downshifting you're just revving the engine more and burning more fuel..

Downshifting is good if you are rolling to the lights which are going to change green before you come to a stop.

Clutch plus install is about $1-1.5k I thought.

Stockish brake pads are like what, $200 a set? Rotors are about $600-800 a set? But you wouldn't need to replace your rotors unless you do a lot of hard braking and they warped would you? ie., track use. In that case you would need to replace your clutch before anything else anyway.

I don't intend to do much track driving, and brake pads should last around 30k I think, so I am happy to sacrifice them rather than my clutch. And I'm too lazy to downshift (main reason) :) My clutch has been changed about 1 year ago to a Nismo copper twin plate clutch, so I think with my driving style it should last many many years to come.

Ahh so you're comparing a nice "brand name" clutch against the price of stock rotors and pads...same quality pls ;)

Probably more chance of warp/hotspots from using the coast/brake method than a combo of gearing and brakes...less load on the brakes = less heatsoak through pads/rotors and calipers.

I wonder If where people live or learnt to drive has an influence on there method of stopping ie:mountain areas compared to plains dwellers..I think It might.

But hey each to their own.. Whatever suit your stylez !!! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
    • It sounds farrrrrrr too cold at your place Duncan... Here I was thinking our 10 degrees overnight is getting cold...
    • oh yeah, reminded this morning....bin lids frozen shut too
    • In my case not, because of total reno. But yeah.
    • Did you use an electronic speedo drive? Does you speedometer read all the way to 180km?
×
×
  • Create New...