Jump to content
SAU Community

PRO Power FC or Power FC


Recommended Posts

Guest Calv R33 GTS25t

Hi All

Im buying a new Power FC from Japan and on offer is the PRO Power FC and the Power FC the difference is about £40.

Only thing is no-one knows the difference apart from its used for racing, this doe'snt really tell me whats different about it.

Does anyone know what extra functions it has and will they ever be of any use? or is it no good to be as I'm not going to race it!

I know you have to use the boost controller on the PRO version, but is an option to activate on the standard one.

Can anyone help me because the moneys burning a hole in my pocket, and am already looking at a bulk order of ice lollys.

Calv

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2193-pro-power-fc-or-power-fc/
Share on other sites

The pro, in conjunction with the boost controller , is supposed to allow a sort of anti lag style launch control.

Am waiting for my mate to translate the bloody jap instructions that came with mine, then I will tell you more.

Ken

Guest Calv R33 GTS25t

Hi Ken

This is the thing that keeps coming up, looks like you can build up more boost on a launch, back tyres will last even fewer miles!

But is it as good for general driving can you set it to run on a mildly tuned setting or even standard as this car is not used for racing.

Have you had it mapped, was it the same mapping procedure and set up with the same laptop software, I dont want to get it to the UK and find I cant get it mapped yet. Thanks for the info.

Calv

PS Ken, Any chance of a copy of the translation?

Originally posted by Calv R33 GTS25t

Hi Ken

   This is the thing that keeps coming up, looks like you can build up more boost on a launch, back tyres will last even fewer miles!  

But is it as good for general driving can you set it to run on a mildly tuned setting or even standard as this car is not used for racing.

Don't know as haven't installed yet

Have you had it mapped, was it the same mapping procedure and set up with the same laptop software, I dont want to get it to the UK and find I cant get it mapped yet. Thanks for the info.

If you can get it mapped , then your doing better than us in WA.

Some one is getting laptop software but at the moment , it's all handcontroller only  

The blokes name is Brent Richards, he's a Aussie living in Japan, his web site is www.nengun.siteblast.com you can make big savings on the UK retail prices, anyway check his sit out.

Calv

PS Ken, Any chance of a copy of the translation?

Depends on how much it's gonna cost me from the translator

Ken

The main difference is that the PRO uses map sensor instead of mass airflow meters. This means you can get rid of those afm's restricting flow, and supposedly the computer will hadle the fact that you have six throttle bodies unlike other map sensored computers. I think this is right this is what i have been told anyway hope it helps:)

Originally posted by Calv R33 GTS25t

So does this mean you have to get rid of your afm or will it run with or without, does your car still have its afm's inline Ken? Let me know about that translation.

Calv

No, as far as I know you have the option but using MAP with the 6 throttle bodies can , I've been told , cause some drivability issues.Translation is about 40 pages so is gonna take some time.

Ken

They use the PRO on the apexi drag cars and apexi recommend it for competition use if you are goin to use it in map sensor mode as ken says although they wont say it the map sensor still has trouble controlling individual throttle bodies. Calv you can get rid of it or you can choose to kepp them depends on the mode you run, if you do run map yes you can vent to atmosphere with blow off valve and there are no probs!!

There is an interesting thing in the latest ZOOM, saying that the Power FC up until now required AFMs, but there is now a 400 AUD option that can eliminate the AFM's.

It's in the section on comparing different ECU's. No comparisson on the Power FC Vs Power FC pro.

From what I've been told, the tuning of the Pro version can take a lot more time as there is no base map.

Can anyone confirm?

Guest Calv R33 GTS25t

So you get no base maps? if you have to set them up from scratch and if you cant load a standard PFC map on its sounds like its going to get expensive!

Unless you are going to get a lot more power without the AFM's it sounds like the standard PFC will be the most suitable, especially if there are drivability problems anyway.

More boost on launch will probally cause traction problems as well with mine being rear wheel drive.

What do you people think?

Calv

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...