Jump to content
SAU Community

Shell V-power Is Back!

R33Turbo

By R33Turbo,
in New South Wales

 Share

Recommended Posts

R33Turbo Proficient

R33Turbo

Posted
Posted

V-power & V-power racing is back! And isn't as expensive as BP Ultimate which is a good thing for me cuz i go coles for shopping as well which gives me those receipts for d/c :)

By the way is it effective putting in v-power racing into our skylines as imports are tuned for 100RON unleaded from factory? Or does v-power racing require separate tuning?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/219377-shell-v-power-is-back/
Share on other sites
Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
Posted

Running on 100ron will decrease your chance of detonation. If your car has been tuned properly on 100 then you may get a marginal increase in power and mileage. You dont NEED to have your car tuned to run 100, its just that its probably not worth the extra money unless your car's been tuned to take advantage of it.

Be warned though, if you tune your car on 100ron it'll be less happy when you inevitably have to put 98 in it! :banana:

Thats just my "2c"... Haha... get it? Ok that was a shit joke... :)

HuH Community Regular

HuH

Posted
Posted

The advice I was given reagrding 98RON fuels, was that V-Power is actually one of the lowest quality ones available. BP's Ultimate, Caltex's Vortex 98 and even the Mobil 8000 were all ranked better by my previous mecahnic?

I say previous because he doesn't service the Skyline, only my Mini Cooper (which is now sold). He was referring specifically to using the fuel in the Mini, but that shouldn't really impact on his opinion of the fuel in general. He's someone who's opinion I hold in quite high regard and I do trust, but it does conflict with what I've heard other people saying?

Anyone got any input on this?

R33Turbo Proficient

R33Turbo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well the only backup ive got for V-power fuel are my air-fuel ratio on from dyno.

The air-fuel ratio was REAL GOOD using V-power fuel. but then again most effective way is for a power fc to detect the level of knocks on different fuels i think?

Clappa Grand Master

Clappa

Posted
Posted

I was actually surprised with the fuel price last night. Mobil in Epping was selling Unleaded for 1.37L..Cheap. I still went to pennant hills though and put V Power in my SS. For some reason, it justs likes V Power better.

Either way, V Power is back..Woo hoo...

Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
Posted
V power is the second highest rated performance fuel, I dont think you mechanic is on the right page!!

Caltex is number one, 1KW ahead.

Good im glad v power is back, caltex just flows through my tank too easily

How can you rate fuel in kw's? :thumbsup:

SL33KY Community Regular

SL33KY

Posted
Posted

So... Which is better performance/fuel pump wise? V-Power or V-Power Racing?

A while ago I was hearing a few stories of people using the V-Power Racing and it was screwing with their fuel pump, can anyone verify this? I use the BP Ultimate...

I just want what's best for my baby :D lol

Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
Posted

Higher octane fuel is denser than regular fuel, so if your fuel pump almost dead anyway then it might make it struggle to the point that it dies completely. Othewise the high octane fuel/fuel pump thing is bollocks.

Also being higher density means that the car runs richer. If your car is running rich to start with then it may not be beneficial at all to make the car run more rich. As i said before, if you're car is tuned for 100 ron then it takes advantage of the lower chance of detonation and allows you to run a more aggressive tune = more power.

At the end of the day, its only 2 ron points so its not going to be a huge difference anyway!

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted
Higher octane fuel is denser than regular fuel, so if your fuel pump almost dead anyway then it might make it struggle to the point that it dies completely. Othewise the high octane fuel/fuel pump thing is bollocks.

Also being higher density means that the car runs richer. If your car is running rich to start with then it may not be beneficial at all to make the car run more rich. As i said before, if you're car is tuned for 100 ron then it takes advantage of the lower chance of detonation and allows you to run a more aggressive tune = more power.

At the end of the day, its only 2 ron points so its not going to be a huge difference anyway!

E10 is typically 3% less dense than 91 Octane ULP but has a higher octane rating. It is a similar situation for V-Power (98) and the 5% ethanol blended V-Power racing (100 octane).

Primordial Grand Master

Primordial

Posted
Posted

Yeah you're right, ethanol lowers the energy density of the fuel. I forgot 100ron is 2% ethanol. Higher octane petroleum is higher in density than its lower octane counterpart though.

Here's some interesting results on the potential power gain by using 100ron: http://www.racefuels.com.au/dynoDetail.asp?ID=59

It looks like about 3.5% peak power gain, and 4.8% peak torque gain between 98RON and 100RON Shell fuel... Keep in mind that they advanced the tuning by 2 degrees and leaned the AF ratio to take advantage of the better fuel so I wouldnt be expecting to get anything near these results without tuning or at least a car with active knock sensors.

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted
Yeah you're right, ethanol lowers the energy density of the fuel. I forgot 100ron is 2% ethanol. Higher octane petroleum is higher in density than its lower octane counterpart though.

Here's some interesting results on the potential power gain by using 100ron: http://www.racefuels.com.au/dynoDetail.asp?ID=59

It looks like about 3.5% peak power gain, and 4.8% peak torque gain between 98RON and 100RON Shell fuel... Keep in mind that they advanced the tuning by 2 degrees and leaned the AF ratio to take advantage of the better fuel so I wouldnt be expecting to get anything near these results without tuning or at least a car with active knock sensors.

Yeah people get trapped and stooged to a degree.

Trapped because fuel is added to the engine in volume not by weight. So a less dense fuel can will give you a higher AFR. Add oxygen in the fuel & you can get yourself in trouble. Wonderful thing if tuned properly, however.

Stooged because you buy fuel by the litre not the kg. So your less fuel efficient E10 (measured in km/litre) costs more than it should.

T04GTR Grand Master

T04GTR

Posted
Posted
V power is the second highest rated performance fuel, I dont think you mechanic is on the right page!!

Caltex is number one, 1KW ahead.

Good im glad v power is back, caltex just flows through my tank too easily

wow a whole 0.5% improvement lol........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just_a_datsun
      RB26 block, rb26 head

      By Just_a_datsun · Posted

      Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • Kinkstaah
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • The Bogan
      Blue slip

      By The Bogan · Posted

      From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...