Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello i would like to know the HP diference between a 63 and 82 ar gt35r, with stock cams, i was told by a couple of well known engine builders, that the diference on a stock camed engine particularly wit the gt35r that the diference up top would be around 15 whp. has any 1 had any direct experiance with something like this, 1 of my engine builder buddies dyno'd 540 rwhp on a clients rb25, greddy intake manifold q45 throttle body, with a ported head, at 24 psi with a gt35 ar .63 ar housing and an AEM ecu

Regan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222265-gt35r-question/
Share on other sites

you shouldnt be worrying about power with exhaust housing to much. thats for the actual turbo size itsself mianly.

exhaust housings should be used to determine how agressive you want your car.

someone posted on here before saying he didnt hit full boost until 5000rpm using a 1.06. which is just a lil to late.

if your still running the 2.5 engine with no cams. stick with .63 or a .86

but to answer your question, i have no idea sorry.

Edited by R34NRG
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222265-gt35r-question/#findComment-3916487
Share on other sites

Hello i would like to know the HP diference between a 63 and 82 ar gt35r, with stock cams, i was told by a couple of well known engine builders, that the diference on a stock camed engine particularly wit the gt35r that the diference up top would be around 15 whp. has any 1 had any direct experiance with something like this, 1 of my engine builder buddies dyno'd 540 rwhp on a clients rb25, greddy intake manifold q45 throttle body, with a ported head, at 24 psi with a gt35 ar .63 ar housing and an AEM ecu

Regan

Im running the .63 rear version, although I have poncams but the rest is the same (Q45 etc) ... havent had the final tune yet but 306rwkw on 16 psi atm (quick tune after engine was run in)... 25psi roughly being the end target... My tuner reckons the rear will max out around the 340ish mark.. Il know by the weekend :blink:

He was impressed at the response though, and said it wouldn't be worth the extra kw at the top end to sacrifice the response I currently have. Although I do have the .82 rear on standby... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222265-gt35r-question/#findComment-3917638
Share on other sites

400rwkw (540rwhp) from a .63 housing and 24psi seems just a little unbelieveable to me.

The .63 limits the GT35 to around 600hp, and it would be so severely choked.

hrm... The .82 (depending on comp wheel) is rated to 700hp i thought? And the 1.06 was the same, just for larger capacity motors so they arent too restricted.

If you have a .63, it'd be getting a turbo from the smaller family, GT3071, GT3076 etc.

.82 for the GT35 or 1.06.

Thats just my choice having had a 600hp GT30/.82, show was on approx 4200rpm (stock RB25 head) really linear but a 550hp/.63 probably better :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222265-gt35r-question/#findComment-3917950
Share on other sites

400rwkw (540rwhp) from a .63 housing and 24psi seems just a little unbelieveable to me.

The .63 limits the GT35 to around 600hp, and it would be so severely choked.

hrm... The .82 (depending on comp wheel) is rated to 700hp i thought? And the 1.06 was the same, just for larger capacity motors so they arent too restricted.

If you have a .63, it'd be getting a turbo from the smaller family, GT3071, GT3076 etc.

.82 for the GT35 or 1.06.

Thats just my choice having had a 600hp GT30/.82, show was on approx 4200rpm (stock RB25 head) really linear but a 550hp/.63 probably better ;)

hahaha thats the biggest load of crap i have heard all year 400rwkw from a .63 housing..lol in your dreams!

the max youll get 340-360 and thats running more than 24psi.. on 1.5bar i was getting 330-340rwkw and it was running a little rich...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222265-gt35r-question/#findComment-3919234
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...