Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if you can run a Z32 AFM on a standard ECU . At the moment i have a GT30r turbo on the car with standard AFM and im unable to run the boost passed 10 pounds anymore as the car hits a wall when coming on to boost.. Im pretty sure its the AFM maxing out and the ECU pulling out all the timing ( going into safe mode )

In the past ive had a z32 with the standard ecu and the car wouldnt run properly. Was wondering would a chipped ECU say like a MINEs ECU be compatable with z32 AFM? The reason im going through all this trouble is i dont want to put my power fc back in for now because A: Needs to be tuned B: Fuel economy goes out the window ( Premuim $1.80 @280 klm a tank) and C: ive seen a lot of cars with yellows stickers in my area and the cops are on to the power fcs.

At the end day i just want to know is there a way of running the boost up to say 12- 14 pounds on a stock ecu with a bigger turbo?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/
Share on other sites

fuel economy can fixed with a real tune - so that fixes point B

point A requires a fixed cost $500 and should fix A and B

you can change the case on the PFC to the std ECU case if you want to hide it - so your worried about them finding the PFC but not the GT30r?

you would mad and stupid to run the turbo to its full potential on the stock ECU

this would imply stupid afr's and stock injectors, ie youll fry something

go back to the PFC and tune it properly

and all of your issues will go away - the stock isnt designed for bigger turbo's etc

you cant run z32 with std ecu unless you get it remapped

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3947469
Share on other sites

Agree with Paul 100% !

BUT the Z32 AFM is just an AFM with more Airflow at a Lower Voltage output than the std unit.

So if you put in a Z32 without doing anything else the AFR's would be way out RICH!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3947524
Share on other sites

Thanks i thought as much

Most cops dont noctice the turbo as its low mounted and i have made the engine bay look stock, still have standard airbox cooler pipes run where stock ones did and boost controller is hidden

Do you know of any good tuners in the south east area who tune at a reasonable price. ive had two full dyno tunes last year and i wasnt happy with both of them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3947536
Share on other sites

Agree with Paul 100% !

BUT the Z32 AFM is just an AFM with more Airflow at a Lower Voltage output than the std unit.

So if you put in a Z32 without doing anything else the AFR's would be way out RICH!

Ahem, More airflow @ a given voltage would make the engine run lean.

There is no such thing as "just an AFM".

AFM output is non linear, so voltage at idle maybe similar but very different at full load.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3947797
Share on other sites

With the right ECU/Tune you should be able to get more out of your current AFM.

I always see people talking about Z32 AFMs etc but I have seen so many high powered cars running stock AFM's.. it makes me really wonder.

In fact I have seen a high powered GTR with a single AFM probe plugged in post intercooler in a 2.5" pipe..

Seems confusing at times..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3948373
Share on other sites

It's possible to tune beyond the point where the maf reads 5.12v, the ecu will continue to increase the amount of fuel based apon rpm.

So you add fuel to the parts of the map where it runs lean eg. higher target afr to achieve correct actual afr.

It's definately not ideal tho.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3951587
Share on other sites

300zx or nissan maxima, 3l v6 afm ran same values as r33 just larger diameter.

I just looked at the VQ maps of both an Z32 VG30det and a R33 S2 rb25det and they are different.

I really couldn't see them having the same values as the VQ map is supposed to tell the ecu how much air is entering the engine.

The z32 AFM having a larger diameter would flow more air for a given voltage.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224152-maxing-out-afm/#findComment-3951655
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...