Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 347
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Clint32

well i was just questioning how you got such a low et with only 113 mph, i run 12.8 at 113mph with 1.89 60ft time on street tyres, you obviously have some tricks, especially since its a month before you are even going to run that time:)

well theres a alot of variables that can contribute to a good ET... but one thing is u cant compare apples with oranges....my car is totally diiferent to urs so y are u even tryin to compare .....try tyre choice for one, suspension setup two, 60ft times three, drag strip ran on four, and the list goes on.... its not tricks...its common sense....or maybe u think i shagged the officials for a fudged time slipp...now theres a trick for you! Just out of curiosity, do u question everybody that runs a better time than u? :) :) cuz rotors do 11s with 90mph passes

Myself and BenM were racing the same night as AMU, Clint there were no slicks or auto, we don't need to cheat in NSW on our 1/2 prepped 3 runs a fornight drag strip :)

Its all skill baby :shake:

Also I have the time slip from when AMU ran the 12.2 as I was racing him hahahaha so trust me its all good

i wasnt accusing anyone of cheating, please tell the tyres you were running then amu they must work extremely well.

Our cars are not different, both skylines, running the same gearbox and diff ratios, mines a bit smaller thats all, Busters time is only 3 thenths quicker with a extra 10 mph.

nearly everyday i pop back into this thread HOPING that the times have either been updated / uploaded or the new site created - and everyday I am once again let down :D

How long is it going to take?

Or should we go back to the old drag list?

My [and others] drag runs were done 3 weeks ago now and still nothing!!! argh!!!

/goes back to feeling sorry for himself...

Sorry about the delay guys. I've got a guy here at work building a database to do all of this much quicker with heaps more details but its taking longer than I thought.

Please read the initial thread message for details.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
NickR33,

I ran a 14.3 @ 98mph with 2.4 60ft when my car only had a cat back zorst and pod filter and on 205s. Your mph seems a little low, even for stock.

Yeah I couldn't get any more than 89mph at the top end, and apparently I was blowing a bit of black smoke. So it could be the stock cat/exhaust restriction or it could be due to the fact I have'nt had the car serviced or tuned since I bought it a month ago... maybe I'm running a little rich?

A 14.3 is very quick for a stock car with exhaust mods :) ...my mate was struggling to do that time with 11psi and 235's!

A 14.3 is very quick for a stock car with exhaust mods :) ...my mate was struggling to do that time with 11psi and 235's!
On my first ever run I managed a 14.46 with 7psi, 225's, POD, full 3" exhaust and an absolutely bucketload of axle tramp (grr grr and grrrr). If I can get rid of the axle tramp i should be into the high 13's which will put a smile on my face (for my driving ability).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...