Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well done BenM but just having a look through it I can see there are some people talking shit there which I dont know why they would.. but yeah some of those are not true.

I know one guy there who has not run what he claims

They are only kidding themselves, not me.

Thanks for the heads-up tho :P

  • Replies 347
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest MFX_R33
I think maybe for now on Ben time slips must be scanned and shown, what do you reckon?

Harun you forgot to post your 60ft time

Time slips aren't much better, as they have no names on them, so you can't tell who's who anyway. One of my runs was against DBRONX WRX and it ran a 10.3. I could just say that was my time.

If someone is enough of a loser to lie about their time, poeple will find out and people will know how pathetic they are.

Jeff.

If I make time slips a requirement then i'd have a total of about 10 people on the list.

Personally... i'd rather be 1sec slower than everyone else then you fib my times and then have 1000 people find out :(

I think Franky has a timeslip against DBRONX too. Awesome if i didnt have it on video though!! :-p

I have a timeslip showing 3.6 @ 6.8mph! Damn plastic bags blowing through the lights!!! Grrr...

I think timeslips are a must for a thread like this but it is really up to benm. :D

Adrian

Guest MFX_R33

I will dig my timeslips up.

I can actually say that I beat DBRONX, cause on my side it says winner. I won't mention the fact that he stalled it up on the line for almost 5 seconds and flew past me a split second after i crossed the line with a 13.7 to his 10.3 :wassup:

Jeff.

One of my customers managed 12.3 in an R33 GTS at Perths motor plex last wed night with only 306rwhp but on race rubber.Very basic bolt on mods only running a Cooler ,Exhaust, Plugin Wolf ECU and a 25/40 Turbo.

Steve thats got to be expected really as by race rubber you mean slicks? If so there's no real comparision to any of the times in this thread as all times are on radial tyres, I'm pretty sure with slicks 90% of the cars on the list would drop there times up to a second plus because all of a sudden the launch isn't as hard and wheel spin is all but gone due to the crinkle sidewall and grip slicks provide

Yep if your happy not running in street trim I guess it is but as I said there is no comparision with that time and the times the cars have ran on this thread because as stated on page 1 NO slick tyres

We can start a new thread if you like for times ran on slicks?

  • 2 weeks later...

The webpage has now been updated (http://skylines.pnc.com.au). I'm still surprised by the lack of R32 and R33 GTR's.

I added in afew more averages to show the difference between the different model Skylines. Obviously the amount of R33 GTS-T makes the biggest impact of this.

Also if everyone currently on the list PM's 1 friend from this forum and lets them know about this thread then we could easily get another 30+ 1/4 times which will make it much more interesting and accurate :(

Ben do you think we could maybe start a section for other imports aswell as there is a lot of other cars then Skylines on the forum

Also now people like Steve-SST are quoting times ran on race rubber hehehe (slicks) we could have a mixed car section for times ran on slicks they wouldn't have to be added to the over all times but merely have there own section for braggging or bagging rights :)

Yup I have many ideas for this 1/4 list but the biggest problem is getting SAU to participate in it.

Some things I would like to add are:

* Tyre sizes (ie; 225/50/16)

* Tyre Brand and model

* Tyre pressure

* 1/4 Mile Track location

* Petrol used

These (to begin with) would give everyone on the list (or reading the list) some great information as it could show that the quick cars are all using similar sized tyres or brand tyre (eg; nitto) etc etc.

If the people already on the list would like to PM me your answers to the 5 above questions then I can start to add this information to the list.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...