Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1993 Silvia specifications

Fitted with 1994 Rb25

Rb25 gear box, with short shift

Custom made forged pistons, from the USA

Compression changed to suit pistons

Fully balanced

O ringed block

Major head work

275 HKS cams

Custom cam gears

Greddy plenum

Q45 throttle body

Custom large aluminum radiator

Huge FMIC

Large Greddy racing BOV

Power FC with hand controler

5-stud conversion

GTR brakes

Performance brake pads

Nismo wheels (17x8 and 17x9)

Brand new tires 235/40 255/40

GTR diff

HKS 2530 turbos (fully rebuilt, and high flowed)

HKS dumps

GTR front pipes

GTR turbo manifold, and pipe work

HKS 4inch super dragger exhaust

High flow cat

1000cc Sard injectors

300zx AFM

Apexi pod filter

3/8 fuel lines

Big competition fuel filter

Malpassi fuel regulator

Nismo Speedo

Map sensor

5-point roll cage (andra spec)

Odyssey battery

Strut brace

OS Giken twin plate clutch, and flywheel

Greddy turbo timer

Custom center dash gauge pod

HKS fuel gauge

HKS oil pressure gauge

HKS boost gaugec

Custom catch can

Shift light

GTR brake master cylinder

Veilside front bar

Veilside side skirts

Trail rear bar

R34 rear wing

Recaro cram leather seats

Koni fully adjustable suspension

Momo steering wheel, and boss kit

Momo gear knob

5-point harness

Alpine head unit

Alpine 6 stacker

Nismo oil filler, and radiator caps

Dark tint

Polished cam covers, and pipe work

The car has been resprayed in its original black

Flared rear guards

All modifications have been blue plated, and transport approved.

Quite easily one of the fastest Silvia’s in Australia, and is up the with the higher power’d Rb25 motors in Australia.

Best time is an 11.4 on STOCK motor with a td06 slap’d on. Can easily do low 10’s now.

Full 5 page ”stage one” write up in number 33 HPI. Will see the “final” write up in an up-coming HPI.

Dyno sheets can/will be available when the car has had a tune up. The car is making 500+RWHP, but is unable to put more then that to the rollers (no traction), so the true amount us un-known

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22461-500hp-s13/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by N/A®

Sorry,

Can you please clearify, you added GTR turbo's, Manifold etc to make it a twin turbo RB25 right? Was this a easy straight forward bolt on?  

Thanks for the info.

No, they are modified GTR items, made to suit an rb25, and highly modified HKS 2530 turbos, No its not easy, or cheap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22461-500hp-s13/#findComment-487271
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...