Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

Given up on my long term r33 project "Cant be bothered putting it back together" decided to wreck it.

Everything except front headlights and gearbox is available. So basically the whole is being parted out.

Car had 67klms on clock been sitting for a while now. Car is white in colour. Shell is complied.

Engine complete r33 series 2 (standard) with 67klms on clock $2000.

S2 AFM $125

climate control $80

s2 engine harness $250 uncut

charcoal cannister $60 (smaller size type)

ac Fan $100

hub/fan $100

Radiator $100

rad. shroud $70

Condensor s1 $100

gaurds $100

s2 front bar cover (black in colour) $200

front s2 fog lights $250 pair

bonnet $350

side skirts $200 pair

complete r33 s2 airbag set drivers/passangers/dash etc $800

s2 cluster $250 with 67klms...

s2 front grill $100

rear tailghts $100 complete

rear bar $100

rear garnish $70

Doors $200 each

boot lid $100

s2 boot spoiler $100

Stealth wing $160 . black in colour.

T wing (optional with stealth) $100

drivers s2 switch $90

rear parcel tray $100.....

S2 dash surround $150

complete interior $600......happy to separate seats trims etc.....

tein adjustable coilovers $750 for the set fronts and rears

s2 diff $250

After market airbox + filter + adapter $120

rear / front lower control arms $100 each

SSR rims 17 by 9inch rears / fronts 17 by 8.5 $600 (rims only atm)

complete 5 stud conversion $800..happy to separate suspension also..........

happy to separate the shell eg Radiator support, rears quaters etc. Please Ask.

PLease pm /post here me if there is anything not listed..im sure i have forgotten heaps....need to sell everthing no more time or space :) Parents onto me to clear everthing lol.

some pics attached

thanks SAU!

post-14355-1215931097_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931187_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931322_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931540_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931607_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931789_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931855_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215931969_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215932023_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215932112_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215932205_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215932298_thumb.jpg

post-14355-1215932356_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227923-r33-series-2-wrecking-my-x-project/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...