Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

just wondering if anyone knows a rough % figure of the power lost through the drivetrain? Eg my R33 came with 187kw @the fly, so minus the figure it had roughly "x" @the wheels.

Also do the GTRs suffer more as they are AWD or less?

Thanx in advanced :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/228493-power-loss-through-drivetrain/
Share on other sites

to answer one of your questions....i think the % power loss is something like 20-30%.....not quiet sure on that maybe someone can elaborate
Yes i was going to say about 30%

and yes GTR's fm suffer a little bit more but not heaps

i would say more like 20-25% for gtst and about 25-30% for a GTR
FWD ~15%

RWD ~25%

4WD ~35%+

See, depends who you ask :ermm:

Ive been told to roughly take 60rwkw off for manual and 70-80rwkw for an auto by a few different people so i tend to use this rough guide, how accurate it is who knows! Percentages have never sat too well with me....

Ive been told to roughly take 60rwkw off for manual and 70-80rwkw for an auto by a few different people so i tend to use this rough guide, how accurate it is who knows! Percentages have never sat too well with me....

that can't be right bud.....you definitely have to look at percentages otherwise a car with 100kw at the flywheel would have about 20kw at the wheels

I would say Dale would have the most idea, thats my more better engrish

yeah those figures make more sense Dale & Steve

that can't be right bud.....you definitely have to look at percentages otherwise a car with 100kw at the flywheel would have about 20kw at the wheels

yeah those figures make more sense Dale & Steve

It's only when engines start putting out decent numbers that i question the 25% loss rule.....Take for instance a 400rwkw engine +25% driveline loss = 500fwkw thats 100rwkw loss through the driveline i would think 60rwkw more realistic. Just my opinion of course.

It's only when engines start putting out decent numbers that i question the 25% loss rule.....Take for instance a 400rwkw engine +25% driveline loss = 500fwkw thats 100rwkw loss through the driveline i would think 60rwkw more realistic. Just my opinion of course.

yeah fair enough

Rather than re-write it all again, here is a comment that sums it up quite well from another thread.

Before everyone gets way off the mark here..

Drive train losses remain static, they do not change, give or take a hp or two, due to better oils etc..

Don't follow the % rule, its wrong, and % losses calculated by coast down calcualtions are incorrect..

best way to explain this is like so, roughly a RWD car will loose about 25ish hp, as your only driving a couple of gears in the box, at 1 to 1 ratio, and the diff gears, so, if your car is making 200hp to begin with, you could say roughly, your making is 230 at the fly wheel, if you then mod the motor, but alter nothing in the driveline, and it now makes 400 at the wheels, its only going to make 430 at the fly wheel, not 460 for example if you where to use the % rule..

Automatic, and 4wd losses are higher, due to the nature in which they operate, but again the figures remain pretty constant, better oils, or driveline components alter this, but again the figure doesn't really move a heck of a lot, it remainds pretty constant, unless of course something is broken, and there is greater friction..

the 60kw figure quoted before im pretty sure is the loss you'll see from a gt-r in 4wd mode, as 60kw is a LOT of power loss for a manual RWD car..

also, a large portion of the driveline loss you see on rolling road dynos, is from the tyres, stuff like over/under inflation of the tyres, weight in the car, and tyre wrap around on the roller affect the figures, so if you dyno your car one day with the tyres at 36psi, then a week later they've gone down to 20psi, you will see less power, as the tyre is wraping around the roller more, more wrap, more friction, more friction the more power needed to over come it, so a lower reading will be seen, hub dynos eliminate this, which is why you will always see a slighly higher reading, and in some cases a bigger reading by comparision to a roller, as you eliminate wheel spin on the roller..

If you took the 25-30% rule and apply this to a high KW car, the loss of power is huge, now convert that into Joules (most power loss is converted to heat, and a small portion into noise) and you have a car that will change the climate for anyone within a few blocks.

In a GTR its not only the added weight of the drive chain and all 8 clutch plates in the transfer case, extra tailshaft, diff centre, drive shafts, brake rotors, wheels etc, but friction between all these individual components, also heat and energy being dispersed in many little directions by vibration can also cause loss of power. Remember the more power you have the more friction is created between components like gearsets etc. A GTR we had on the dyno had 270AWkw and then 330rwkw. So there's 60kilowats just in the removal of the front driveline, remove the rear driveline to get flywheel kilowatts and your probably looking at another 35-40kw+++

Edited by Ryanrb25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...