Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

very good results and i'm sure the drivability is awesome.

Although, has anyone had any experience with the T67 or TD06SH-25G on an RB20?

We could do this with a T67 for shits and giggles considering this car and a T67 RB25 live very close to each other ;)

the reason i ask is b/c i have a complete T67 kit sitting in my garage which i'm thinking of bolting onto my rb20.

honestley its perfect for a RB25 but i would not put one on a std rb20... well actually i would if it was mine... but it will be quite laggy and they really require 1.2-1.3bar to make it into thier sweet zone..

if you were a customer i would say sell the t67 and fit the l2 to the kit you have, if it was me i would slap it on and start playing on the dyno :P

honestley its perfect for a RB25 but i would not put one on a std rb20... well actually i would if it was mine... but it will be quite laggy and they really require 1.2-1.3bar to make it into thier sweet zone..

if you were a customer i would say sell the t67 and fit the l2 to the kit you have, if it was me i would slap it on and start playing on the dyno :P

that's a fair point.

the car i bought actually had a stroker RB24 in it before i bought it which i also have all the parts to.

fitting it to the rb20 would just be for shits and giggles and to be honest, it would be better than the stocker that's on there now.

btw, 1.2-1.3 bar doesn't scare me :P

URAS,

after checking the Trust website, the T67 and the TD06SL2-20G actually share the same turbine wheel (54.1/61mm), although the T67 has the larger 25G comp wheel.

given this, i guess it wouldn't be that bad.

only one way to confirm this and that's to bolt it up to my POS ;-)

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

what turbo do u have?

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

What sort of power is it making with the 10cm?

What sort of power is it making with the 10cm?

It was making a little over 200kw on 14psi with stock injectors/afm and cat back exhaust.

ok, so the smaller turbine with the 20G comp wheel.

how does it drive with the 10cm housing?

Drove well, mind you i didn't get much of a chance after it was tuned as the motor let go about 30mins of fun later :D

New set up see's a healthier motor with injectors, cams, Z32 etc so hopefully can see better results that will last a little longer this time!!!

200rwkw ain't bad on 14psi, although with the new engine, supporting mods and an aggressive tune, results should also be very impressive.

was it laggy/doughy mid-rpm with the 10cm housing?

Yeah couldn't complain, just would of been nice if it lasted a little longer and i actually got to drive it ;)

Im keen to get it finished and tuned (still looking at who will tune it) and if i will run with an EBC or stick with the turbotech. It wasn't really what i would call laggy and the mid-rpm was where all the fun was :rofl:

I'll try and scan the graph and post it up so you can see :D

i'm happy to hear yet another great result from the RB20. these sorta threads keep me motivated to support the little ripper.

who gives a shit about lag down low when you have all hell breaking loose up top! :rofl:

;) exactly, i couldn't of said it better myself.

Im hoping with the larger cams it will help bring boost on a little earlier to overcome the low range lag :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lol a few are like that with no intention of being reborn unfortunately. 
    • Done, I'll do mine soon too - whenver I take out the car next. I can cheat and make it quieter by turning off VCT at idle too - but I lose the braps
    • All trim back in wired running driving. Few things to follow up on but not far off the return to the road. att.6HN4wP38LTIOISkhA8eACoBFqzfgQMahZPLA8ut0pqE.mp4 att.w2q0ux2PGuqgQTj2Os13cNHQtqcSEcCAhD_CAXy_IQM.mp4
    • The trouble with phone apps is that they really do not know the sensitivity of the mic on each specific phone, whether there is some sort of cover or skin that can change that, etc etc. So the readings off them are not calibrated. You certainly couldn't be sure that you were even within 3 dB. I have the same app on two (actually more than that) different phones/tablets and the readings in the same room at the same time are never the same. I don't mind the apps - they are as useful as a dyno - if you're testing for delta from thing1 to thing2. But not to try to generate some sort of absolute value.
    • I'm gonna use the "Sound Meter" app from the Google Play Store and as close as I can bother to these procedures: 4. TEST METHOD FOR ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT PRE ADR83 IN-SERVICE GOODS VEHICLES AND OMNIBUSES 4.1 Microphone position 4.1.1 The microphone shall be directed towards the orifice of the exhaust outlet and shall be supported by a tripod or similar device not providing excessive acoustic reflection. The general requirements for positioning microphones are shown in the Appendix. 4.1.2 The nominal axis of maximum sensitivity of the microphone shall be substantially parallel to the test site surface and shall make an angle of 45 degrees ±10 degrees with the principal direction of gas flow from the exhaust. 4.1.3 In selecting the 45 degree alignment from the outlet of a motor vehicle fitted with two or more outlets, only the angle resulting in the microphone being farthest from any other outlet must be used. National Stationary Exhaust Noise Test Procedures for In-Service Motor Vehicles Page 3 4.1.4 The height of the microphone above the test site surface shall be equal to that of the orifice of the exhaust outlet ±25mm but shall not be less than 200mm above the test site surface. 4.1.5 The distance of the microphone from the exhaust outlet orifice shall be 500mm±25mm. 4.1.6 [Relates to vertical exhaust outlets] 4.1.7 For vehicles fitted with one exhaust outlet the microphone shall be placed so that the greatest possible distance is achieved between it and the vehicle. 4.1.8 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] 4.1.9 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] TLDR: 200mm off ground 45 degree angle relative to exhaust flow 500mm from tailpipe exit. (I probably won't use a tripod) Here's a photo, cause I read the instructions wrong myself.
×
×
  • Create New...