Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

very good results and i'm sure the drivability is awesome.

Although, has anyone had any experience with the T67 or TD06SH-25G on an RB20?

We could do this with a T67 for shits and giggles considering this car and a T67 RB25 live very close to each other ;)

the reason i ask is b/c i have a complete T67 kit sitting in my garage which i'm thinking of bolting onto my rb20.

honestley its perfect for a RB25 but i would not put one on a std rb20... well actually i would if it was mine... but it will be quite laggy and they really require 1.2-1.3bar to make it into thier sweet zone..

if you were a customer i would say sell the t67 and fit the l2 to the kit you have, if it was me i would slap it on and start playing on the dyno :P

honestley its perfect for a RB25 but i would not put one on a std rb20... well actually i would if it was mine... but it will be quite laggy and they really require 1.2-1.3bar to make it into thier sweet zone..

if you were a customer i would say sell the t67 and fit the l2 to the kit you have, if it was me i would slap it on and start playing on the dyno :P

that's a fair point.

the car i bought actually had a stroker RB24 in it before i bought it which i also have all the parts to.

fitting it to the rb20 would just be for shits and giggles and to be honest, it would be better than the stocker that's on there now.

btw, 1.2-1.3 bar doesn't scare me :P

URAS,

after checking the Trust website, the T67 and the TD06SL2-20G actually share the same turbine wheel (54.1/61mm), although the T67 has the larger 25G comp wheel.

given this, i guess it wouldn't be that bad.

only one way to confirm this and that's to bolt it up to my POS ;-)

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

what turbo do u have?

This has really got me thinking of going to the 8cm rear for mine now :P

Would be interesting to see a comparison back to back with nothing else changed and see what the results were between the two overlapped???

What sort of power is it making with the 10cm?

What sort of power is it making with the 10cm?

It was making a little over 200kw on 14psi with stock injectors/afm and cat back exhaust.

ok, so the smaller turbine with the 20G comp wheel.

how does it drive with the 10cm housing?

Drove well, mind you i didn't get much of a chance after it was tuned as the motor let go about 30mins of fun later :D

New set up see's a healthier motor with injectors, cams, Z32 etc so hopefully can see better results that will last a little longer this time!!!

200rwkw ain't bad on 14psi, although with the new engine, supporting mods and an aggressive tune, results should also be very impressive.

was it laggy/doughy mid-rpm with the 10cm housing?

Yeah couldn't complain, just would of been nice if it lasted a little longer and i actually got to drive it ;)

Im keen to get it finished and tuned (still looking at who will tune it) and if i will run with an EBC or stick with the turbotech. It wasn't really what i would call laggy and the mid-rpm was where all the fun was :rofl:

I'll try and scan the graph and post it up so you can see :D

i'm happy to hear yet another great result from the RB20. these sorta threads keep me motivated to support the little ripper.

who gives a shit about lag down low when you have all hell breaking loose up top! :rofl:

;) exactly, i couldn't of said it better myself.

Im hoping with the larger cams it will help bring boost on a little earlier to overcome the low range lag :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...