Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hya, iv had my R32 sky with approx 250rwhp for a couple of months now.. and basically Im bored of the power, I want more. I love the car, dont love the lag.

Are 33's worth it over the 32? or more to say is the 25 any quicker of the 20. I cant afford a GTR at this stage but im wanthing something I can get power out of easier without feeling im being too hard on the motor.

but yeh feed back on what you think of your 33 and even would love to hear comparisons of what people think who have driven both

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229669-im-bored-of-the-32/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

stay with the r32 man...there is too many r33's out there and personally i like the r32 look way better..you wont get much more power than the r32 and they are very similar the only thing that is newer and nicer is the interior...but who cares...R32 FTW...

tha major issue i think is im worried about spending too much money on a R32 GTST.. like at the end of the day its not a GTR and if i was to build a stupid hp 25 for my 32 its not going to have the same aurora so to speak. But im thinking, its not to far off displacement as a 26 anyway & 450hp is 450hp.. a 26 will just be easier to get more than 500hp than a 25 correct and even then its going to cost ALOT to get more than factory hp on a 26 anyway correct. not to mention I love the 32GTR body shape, if i was to do a Rb25 32 with GTR guards it would be concidered a wank and a insult to gtr owners

it is kind of hard to convince myself to just put a 25 in the 32 and be done with it.

I duno im really undecided

Edited by BANGN

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
    • But again, the engineers said your cast aluminium would be fine based on the load that would be stretching that section. Same load stretching the bolts in a flex (not the twist), with a much smaller cross sectional area than the original part you've broken. It's why you'd need to be using higher strength bolts, but that's just making up for the strength you lose with less area...
    • I am truly amazed someone on this planet was able to cycle the pump using a scan tool. I've always ghetto cycled them on Nissan 90s shit boxes by slamming the brakes and pulling the handbrake to agitate the rear wheels enough to cause a speed difference
    • I didn't actually try it at the time but a Launch X431 with the appropriate software licenses/upsell will have the ABS bleed function. The Consult II you can still find some old sets of equipment but they're really, really expensive:   
    • Well I'll start by saying I'm not an engineer. I am going to go with the KiwiCNC ones.  They are made of 7050 alloy have good fillets and radius.  The material alone is in the order of double the strength and fatigue resistance - Those bolts, once torqued correctly place most of the load at the flat face of the mating surface - the 'stretch' you're talking about through torqueing them up would be far more than the extra stretch 'load' placed on them from a steering input or bump. (in my opinion) so I doubt they would flinch.    - but again "not an engineer".      oh and I don't think stitch welding 7050 is a good idea, likely just weaken the material (from what I read)
×
×
  • Create New...