Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey

i want to buy a r32

ive been looking around iand ts hard to find a non turbo one and when u find one there more expensive then the turbo ones

how hard would it be to buy a turbo r32 and take out the turbo and how much would it cost to do

i would have to replace the ecu with a non turbo one and get a non turbo inlet and outlet manifold.

any advice would be really appreciated

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/
Share on other sites

If you do the work yourself it shouldnt be too expensive..

You need;

Intake piping

Exhaust mani/Headers - I have a stock exhaust manifold if you are looking to buy.

NA ECU.

Now the problem is compression ratio. The last thing you want is a low compression 2L NA.

You could always take off the head and shave the balls off it to get the NA 10:1 C.R. Or shave a little more and run a higher CR to give it more poke. Say 11 or 11.5:1. I figure if your taking off the head you may aswell.

Thats about it.

But why buy an NA R32 when there are so many better NA options available?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/#findComment-4060454
Share on other sites

The compression ratio of your RB20DE-T (as well as various flow characteristics of the cams etc, which I don't know is the same between NA and FI) isn't your only problem.

The gearing is completely different between the turbo cars and NA, so even if you pull apart the engine to increase the compression ratio and get its efficiency close to NA, the thing is still going to run like a dog. Theoretically you could just replace the final drive and leave the gearbox itself as-is and you'd get most of your performance back, but there's another expense.

For the cost of doing what you want to do to an R32 GTS-t, you could have bought a good car.

Also, its also debatable whether its legal for you to drive it. Some people have called the RTA, who've said its OK to take the turbo off, but a guy I know called the RTA who told him it was OK to drive a 350Z on his P's without an exception, even though its clearly marked in the banned list.

The wording of the rule is that P platers cannot drive cars where the engine performance has been "modified". Note, it doesn't say "increased", just changed from its factory specification. If your car is meant to have a turbo and doesn't, the performance is no longer the same as when it rolled off the factory floor. A "letter of the law" interpretation says the car is therefore still not P plater legal.

If a cop's in a bad mood, its a reasonable interpretation as an excuse to ruin your day.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/#findComment-4062191
Share on other sites

I don't know about 32s... but 33 na's I believe have slightly lumpier cams? don't quote me on that though. also, as everyone has already said... compression ratio... not to mention the pistons will be a little bit of a different shape as well... the turbo ones have a lump ontop and the na's are flat..(also from memory)... to be honest... its not worth it.... you will be spending that much money for absolutely 0.

if you do do it.... and you don't increase compression and all the rest of the crap... excels will flog you... it may be nice to say you drive a skyline.. but driving it would be horrible! just wait till a good na comes around. you will be much better off... or look at na silvias... 180s.... 200s... dont just limit yourself to one na import :P cuz there are heaps of other na imports!

Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/#findComment-4065687
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
i was looking at the same thing too but with a r33 cuz i want to put the turbo back on when i get my full licence..if money is not an issue then whats the downside?

In all honesty, you're better off just waiting until a suitable NA pops up, then selling it when you're ready for a turbo. Once you start pulling apart an engine, unless you're building up it lets all the gremlins in.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/#findComment-4101411
Share on other sites

In all honesty, you're better off just waiting until a suitable NA pops up, then selling it when you're ready for a turbo. Once you start pulling apart an engine, unless you're building up it lets all the gremlins in.

Im still gonna get a quote on the job anyways to see what price they reakon

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231193-removing-turbo/#findComment-4101508
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...