Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by predator666

:)  

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&threadid=23144

Doesn't that fit under the above classification? even if it is a Magna

firstly... i want to apologise coz i didn't read this thread.

secondly... this was at calder at the strip not on the roads ....yes that'll do

thirdly... i didn't stall the auto coz i didn't have time before the lights changed but i would have still lost anyways.

fourthly... and finally... my car is not completely stock. i have a cat-back, filter, and CAI. so that factors into the equation...

After 100k the engine ain't making no where near the stock power outputs and with my mods i rekon it brings it back to almost on par. As for the verada with 20k on the clock it is pretty much making initial power and hasn;t lost power due to wear and tear.

I'm thinking of getting that dump pipe from BATMBL does anyone think this will make any difference?

cheers,

Waz.

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Often those mitsubishi's wanna test their car against me (Everyone thinks I drive an M3, not a 325i)... A few times I've taken the challenge... My car is faster in all ways, except the driver - I don't ever hammer my clutch, so baby it off the line at 2000rpm which generally sees me giving them a long lead to start with - still, i gain on them pretty quickly. :)

But then again, my engine is a finely tuned 2.5l 6cyl BMW engine with VANOS (still, it's stock)!

Guest INASNT

I been driving the new 2003 magnas around up north (hire cars) and they go preety nice. They really start to move from around 3500rpm and pull preety hard through to 6000rpm redline, but they torque steer preety bad to the right when accelerating hard.

Sound like you auto tranny is the thing letting u down waz

An auto GTS-t will smoke a lighter 3.5V6 Magna, let alone the heavier Verada!!!!!

My GTS-t was an auto, and my friend's Magna can't even keep up even in 0-60 acceleration only..... they don't make as much power, and all Magna/Verada range are lots heavier than skylines... talk about power to weight ratio, you know who the winner is...

Originally posted by rs73

An auto GTS-t will smoke a lighter 3.5V6 Magna, let alone the heavier Verada!!!!!

Why I know this? My GTS-t was an auto, and my friend's Magna can't even keep up even in 0-80 acceleration only..... they don't make as much power, and all Magna/Verada range are lots heavier than skylines... talk about power to weight ratio, you know who the winner is...

what's my problem then?

could it be too thick oil (i use 15w60)? is something stuffed do you think?

any ideas... and i'm not talking about modding i mean what would bring the power back to what it should be

Oh, urs is R32? I dunno abt auto R32, your RB20DET makes less power than RB25DET from factory.

Mine was R33 auto (I have now converted to manual), and I got 138rwkw back when it was an auto. Now I got 154rwkw so with more power, I'm sure it would be faster than any Magna or Verada. Don't think it's the oil. I use 10w40 shouldn't be too much different with your 15w60.

So that could be the reason why your R32 GTS-t is having a tough time to beat a Magna. Mind though that the latest VR-X series Magna & Verada engines made at least 163kw. Not sure about rwkw but I would imagine somewhere around 120rwkw depend on the condition of clutch or torque converter.... and their 3.5L engine definitely have more low down torque than lumpy low response RB engines. Our RBs only get lively above 3000rpm. Over 400m if you keep accelerating, I am sure your R32 will win by a lot, but not 0-60.

Well, you need to go to the drag strip to prove 400m, not on the street!

didnt read the 32 part :P

all i know is that i raced at calder against a supercharged 3.8litre holden when my car was stock other than a catback (only just imported from Japan about a month earlier) and i beat him by about a car length... the SS i raced on the same night which had a zorst and air filter beat me by about the same length :D way too much torque for my little 2litre hehe even tho i did hit rev limiter on second gear (first time ever dragging or doing those speeds).

both cars i raced were auto... when i was a n00b driver... if i can beat a supercharged 3.8litre in a manual i cannot see any reason why u could not beat a 3.5litre NA auto.

PS. magnas dont have RWKW :) they are FWD :)

the verada 3.5 V6 isn't as bad as i think everyone believes. they are heaps quicker than an equivalent commonwhore.

you have to remember that most magna/verada's are the 3.0 V6 version. its only the later models that are the 3.5L and they kill it off the line...

and redlineGTR... stop whoring :P

i just think what i would do if i had a spare couple of grand to put into the car... hmmmm...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...