Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

"I would guess i'm about 400hp to the rear wheels or less"<----- mate he clearly said 400hp or less :whistling:. so before you try and make a cock out of him, might wanna read carefully :D.

the guy seems to do all the work/tuning himself, through reading etc. takes alot of guts to rebuild a motor and tune it on your own. so unless you are sum guru, i wouldnt mock him :).

Read my post again 'carefully'. I've placed the area of concern in BOLD

You mention its making 600hp in the vid you posted. Not a chance with that turbo and especially with it bolted on to the std exhaust manifold.

Quote from his VID LINK -> CHECK ME OUT IN MY SKYLINE DOING A BURNOUT!!! 20psi@ 600 BHP

the blokes been nothing but polite and has said nothing but praise this forum, so why dont u guys cut him some slack and either a) help him out and answer his question, or b) keep ur 2c to urself :)

Posting a vid of doing a burnout on SAU in a public street and you wonder why people have game him shiet.

Yes I was a 'little' bit of an arse but you get that when a burnout on a public street is posted on SAU.

firstly i did read ur lovely post carefuly, but what is said in the video holds little weight when someone CLEARLY states in the TITLE of the post, and in the body of his thread (bout it being approx 400hp), when asking for your opinion :whistling:

secondly the guy lives in the Bahamas, and that street seems quieter then my driveway. throughout that whole video not one car drove by.

if u were indeed worried about the safety aspect of his post, u would have more likely commented on his method of tuning rather then an innocent burn out :D.

anyway good luck with finding ur answer dude, and hat off to u for being gutsy enuf to tune/mod ur car on ur own :)

thank for the support cubes.

On the you tube video i did claim to have 600 hp @ 20psi. lol, after sitting in a real car that was a supra with a t51r. i new my car was over rated, i cant change what i said, so please don't take it to haert. i'm still think that this site out of all the other is the site that can come out on top if everyone was to be understanding. ok to make eveyone happey the car is only 20 hp ok. lol.

we had some races down here and i'v beaten some stock gt-r's and mod pulsars gtir and mod silvias. i'm using the rb25det in the r33 body as a ginypig.

i'm planing on putting a fully built motor (sending 25000 usd on the motor) in a 200sx. check the other link out please

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m2QV5QEK_U

this is why i'm asking questions.? i'm planing on making 800hp. i think i'll go with the t51r turbo that thing is crazy. looks good to.

Its all good... Try not to take a little ribbing from us Aussy's too hard. Its our strange nature.

You can edit the comments section of your vid on you tube.

I believe with it holding 20psi to peak power with std cams and manifolds some where around 280-300rwkw (400rwhp) So damn close to 500hp at the fly.

I've got basically the same turbo GT3076r .82 IW (HKS3037ProS) on my rb30det but it has cams (265/265) and it made 302rwkw on 17psi. Prior to cams it did struggle to nudge past 280rwkw.

To push 800hp on pump fuel you will most likely have to drop in a set of solid lifters, new valve springs, machine the buckets and run 10.50-11mm lift cams and not to forget a nice exhaust manifold.

Its all good... Try not to take a little ribbing from us Aussy's too hard. Its our strange nature.

You can edit the comments section of your vid on you tube.

I believe with it holding 20psi to peak power with std cams and manifolds some where around 280-300rwkw (400rwhp) So damn close to 500hp at the fly.

I've got basically the same turbo GT3076r .82 IW (HKS3037ProS) on my rb30det but it has cams (265/265) and it made 302rwkw on 17psi. Prior to cams it did struggle to nudge past 280rwkw.

To push 800hp on pump fuel you will most likely have to drop in a set of solid lifters, new valve springs, machine the buckets and run 10.50-11mm lift cams and not to forget a nice exhaust manifold.

I was planing on running vp racing fuel. 116 octain. but that will be after i reach the limits of this motor first.

Cubes do you think tomei cams 256/256 cams will be a power adder for an upgrade on stock valve train.?

what cam spec have you heard of that can help in this situation. I heard a lot of bad talk about adding cam if people are not going to upgrade valve spring etc.

I know that the car makes good power for our standards. I'm beating gt r's over here man, now i know that this can only happen over here, as i know the gt r's are a better machine. in the matter of 6 months i went from last to first and I'm the man everyone is looking to beat. I must say that all my winning came from this site and people like you helping and writing about things that keep use all winning.

if I'm willing to put the head back off what upgrades would you recommend.

thank s again Cubes

you attitude will make you very prosperous in life.

Its all good... Try not to take a little ribbing from us Aussy's too hard. Its our strange nature.

You can edit the comments section of your vid on you tube.

I believe with it holding 20psi to peak power with std cams and manifolds some where around 280-300rwkw (400rwhp) So damn close to 500hp at the fly.

I've got basically the same turbo GT3076r .82 IW (HKS3037ProS) on my rb30det but it has cams (265/265) and it made 302rwkw on 17psi. Prior to cams it did struggle to nudge past 280rwkw.

To push 800hp on pump fuel you will most likely have to drop in a set of solid lifters, new valve springs, machine the buckets and run 10.50-11mm lift cams and not to forget a nice exhaust manifold.

I was planing on running vp racing fuel. 116 octain. but that will be after i reach the limits of this motor first.

Cubes do you think tomei cams 256/256 cams will be a power adder for an upgrade on stock valve train.?

what cam spec have you heard of that can help in this situation. I heard a lot of bad talk about adding cam if people are not going to upgrade valve spring etc.

I know that the car makes good power for our standards. I'm beating gt r's over here man, now i know that this can only happen over here, as i know the gt r's are a better machine. in the matter of 6 months i went from last to first and I'm the man everyone is looking to beat. I must say that all my winning came from this site and people like you helping and writing about things that keep use all winning.

if I'm willing to put the head back off what upgrades would you recommend.

thank s again Cubes

your attitude will make you very prosperous in life.

Hi Mark,

it seems like your questions are answered, mainly that if you're are chasing 600hp then you will need a bigger turbo. Some tomei poncams will net you more top end, as well as higher average power and torque throughout the range.

It sounds like you guys have fun over there, how lenient are the police?

Do you race from standing start or rolling run? because if you go to a bigger turbo you will likely just end up wasting time trying to get traction off the line, or bog down and then lose traction as it comes onto boost.

if you want to be unbeatable, get one of those gtr's and apply your modding skills to that! if you go nuts on a RWD platform, you may get taken by less powerful cars due to circumstances mentioned above. Great work building it all up yourself and then tuning it!

Dont be discouraged if you come across some unconstructive people, this is the internet afterall, but as you know there are some really great people on here that are happy to offer their help.

cheers

Hi Mark,

it seems like your questions are answered, mainly that if you're are chasing 600hp then you will need a bigger turbo. Some tomei poncams will net you more top end, as well as higher average power and torque throughout the range.

It sounds like you guys have fun over there, how lenient are the police?

Do you race from standing start or rolling run? because if you go to a bigger turbo you will likely just end up wasting time trying to get traction off the line, or bog down and then lose traction as it comes onto boost.

if you want to be unbeatable, get one of those gtr's and apply your modding skills to that! if you go nuts on a RWD platform, you may get taken by less powerful cars due to circumstances mentioned above. Great work building it all up yourself and then tuning it!

Dont be discouraged if you come across some unconstructive people, this is the internet afterall, but as you know there are some really great people on here that are happy to offer their help.

cheers

thanks for the heads up SLY33

Off the line isn't that much of a problem as i use one of the best tire and boost controller on the market they call it the skyline's of boost controller and cost about 1200-1300 usd. check the link of http://www.world-motorsports.com/products.php a cheaper model is the pbc this unit is about 500 usd, I can boost by gear in drag mode or street mode. its a touch screen unit.

I really think if it wasn't for this contoller the 4wd crew would have had there way with me.

I will get a gtr, but I'm trying to be the best in my class even, out of my class people with gtrs thought they can kick my as-

but it just didn't happen. i some ways i like the fact that a gtst can beat a gtr by running it down and pasting it .

It give all the people hope that has gtst skyline's. Over here there is way more gtst than the hole 2 gtrs on this island.

The police, man over here they ain't no problems. i guess you can say the love the races. we can even drink and drive lol.

we have a saying (It's better in the Bahamas). the only thing i hate is the fact that we have to pay 65% duty on car parts, but theres ways around that i guess.

I do know that the GTRS are the mean machines. In the coming future i think i will buy one r33 model i'm planing on putting a t51r on the bastard.

can you tell me what spec tomei poncams to use on the gtst. with stock valve train. and another spec use springs and valves etc.

i don't mind pulling the head back off.

thanks keep up the good work ASU.

  • 1 month later...

lol well going back to the rb25det burnouts, i think this a f**king solid effort lol, new zealand style

check out his other vids aswell, looks like that car gets a good solid raping lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...