Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what size is the hole and it doesnt matter if you go into the water gallery does it just a bit of lock tight and all is sweet yeah

the tensioner is m10x1.5 and yes u go into the water gallery, worked out perfect from the pdf document measurements, possibly a touch tight but i can get the belt on so thats good.

i bought a s1 block and managed to not notice it had the uneven cast face for the bottom idler so it didnt sit right, we used some liqued metal and made a flat face, worked great and was easy to do.

just gotta send the block off for decking and tap the oil drain hole (we havent got a tap and drill bit that big so ill leave it to the machine shop).

Then i can throw the parts back in and the head is all complete, just need some bigger shims and its almost ready to go.

Need to decide on what turbo to go for now, i got a limit of 430rwhp or so and dont wanna run more than 18-19psi boost if possible. Its either gt3040r, gt3076r or gt3540r, decisions decisions :wave:

i have the same problem with the bottom tensioner. the hole for it is allready there however no surfast to sit on, after reading the liquied metal idea i went and purchased some selleys stuff.

however it says will only handle 120C of heat. would the constant spinning of the tensioner create a friction heat of excess of that is what i am wondering, considering if it did fail and the tensioner let the belt slip off it would cause some rather major damage.

or would getting a cast iron welder to fill it up then smooth over be a better option.

or just buy the right block in the first place, hits self over back off head

i have the same problem with the bottom tensioner. the hole for it is allready there however no surfast to sit on, after reading the liquied metal idea i went and purchased some selleys stuff.

however it says will only handle 120C of heat. would the constant spinning of the tensioner create a friction heat of excess of that is what i am wondering, considering if it did fail and the tensioner let the belt slip off it would cause some rather major damage.

or would getting a cast iron welder to fill it up then smooth over be a better option.

or just buy the right block in the first place, hits self over back off head

i bought some and its rated to over 300C of heat from memory, the tensioner doesnt spin on the block surface, the part bolting onto the block is sitting hard on the face of the block and doesnt move.

heres a pic of the tensioner spot setup with the liquid metal....

post-40430-1219241466_thumb.jpg

to hold the liquid in when its drying i used a bit of bluetack and made a little barrier to stop it running all over the place, put the tensioner stud in WITH oil on the threads and then just fill it up till its abit above flush and then let it go off for 20 min or so, wind the bolt out a fraction as to make sure its not stuck in and then file the surface flat using the waterpump surface etc as a guide to get it spot on. The bolt can then be takin out and the threads remain so u can screw it in and out without any problems.

what was the brand name of this product and what store was it in. i could only see one type of metal substance at bunnings prolly not the best store for it but it was more of a putty. also i noticed that the hole for the tensioner bolt in that position sits back into the block abit making the bolt shorter then the top tensioner and cam gears?

Edited by ahh 33 s2

just an update on the idler mounting on a s1 block. I just tried to torque the idler pulley onto the liqued metal flat spot and it distorted the flat spot so looks like ill have to sort something else out, mayybe i should of made the flat spot a fair bit bigger, ill update when i find a solution. Pity i spent money on the block decking it and acid bath etc, now its all assembled and i find this damn problem :D

Edited by unique1

thanks mate for the idea, i got something else lined up first i shall try, ill post info once i see if it works or not. I dont really wanna weld the block as its been decked now and internals are all installed, do u think anything would be effected if i heated up the idler area to braze it up?

yeah I had this prob a little while back on one of my first builds, ended up making a custom washer about 1cm thick that fits over the stud and is ground away on an angle underneath to suit the block. Hardest part is getting the correct angle on the washer underneath so that when the tensioner torques down, it doesn't come off centre, had it done in a day of mucking around with the grinder tho.

Well i have sorted the problem most likely, ended up welding up the area and grinding it flat, looks good and should work ok, i have bolted idler on and its fine, havent fitted the belt yet or run it so not gonna say its worked until its actually running :D

what did the welding set you back

i did it at home so it was free, took a while trying to not get too much heat into the block and distorting the water pump area of the block, took a good hour or so as its alot of metal area to build up. We did a test run on a spare old rb26 block i got here to make sure it would stick and work ok :D

As i said i wont say its 100% right until i see the motor run for a while, but looks like the best option available if u happen to get a s1 block.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...