Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well the 5.5 figure was based on the following calculation

step one

jump on scales

step two

read scaled weight of my own weight

three pick up bike

four jump back on scales

five subtract my human weight and be left with the bike wieight - which according to scales, was 5.5kg - which im sure is inaccurate figure

and not to disagree but picking it up it defs doesn't weigh 7 or higher you can lift it effortlessly with one finger

either way who cares

and to stop a fix gear bike you either skid by locking out your knees and pushing back on your back foot.. or

you just slow down your pedalling by gently pressing back on the pedals

both are very bad for your knees - also another thing to take into account riding fixgear, is if the wheels are turning, the pedals are turning too. so that means... if you're turning. you're pedalling.

if your turning - hard. you're leaning... hard...

hard leaning and flaining pedals is not good fun should your pedal contact the bitumen.

=)

more colourful love..

8d2a3_4114658564_f84550da30_b.jpg

31479_SNC107311.JPG.jpeg

vans-fuji-track-bike-1-540x303-494x277.jpg

continuum-bicycles.jpg

cdale-v3_4.jpg

cannondaleTrack.jpg

few more variants of the capo

CIMG2861-1.jpg

capo13.6resize.jpg

Capo_014.jpg

Cherry1.jpg

Edited by Mr Eps

I've got 2 road bikes and 2 MTB's.

I've got a Time Edge road bike w/ Campy Chorus and Easton wheels. Great bike. Also a Steel SS for commuting and training.

I've got a Cannondale Caffeine w/ a lefty fork for XC riding/mild trails, and a Nicholai CC w/ a 15mm Talas fork and some nice custom wheels for a technical riding. Beautiful bike.

Build up everything myself except the Cannondale. Love meching on my bikes and stuff. Nobody touches them but me. It's all in the small things.

I used to live to cycle. I was riding 20 hrs a week in 2008 then fcuked by back up and can't ride properly now. Had an MRI but just some minor disk protrusion and nothing that 'should' stop me riding. Need to chase this back up w/ my sports doc once I recover from my shoulder surgery 'cos can't live w/out cycling. :rolleyes: Fcuking depressed about it.

Edited by Tony de Wonderful

did a bit of research. the capo comes in at around 19 pounds. that's 8.6kg, which is still rather light, but about where i thought it would be. bikes are very decieving with their weight. 8kg can feel much lighter because it is on a bigger item, yet if you put 8kg into someone the size of a football it will feel much heavier.

and since i'm bored, to give you an idea of weights (all weights from manufacturer's websites):

wheels: 1995g pair

tyres: 350g each

cranks: 741g with 2 chainrings. second chainring only adds approx 50g

BB: 160 to 300g depending on model used

handlebars: 680g

stem: 180g

seat post: 345g

chain: approx 300g

so without frame, forks, pedals, freewheel, headset, brakes, seat, and grips you are up around 5kg. frame and forks would weigh close to 2kg. i have done a few build-ups using kitchen scales to weigh parts before putting the bike together and you get shocked the first time you do it. you pick the bike up and think it's really light and then tally up the weights and find that while it is light in comparison to other bikes, the actual weight of it is pretty high. the wheels are always the heaviest part of the bike.

also an interesting fact: the UCI (world cycling body) has a minimum weight that bikes must be to compete. it is 15lbs, which is around 6.8kg.

i cruise at about 35/45kmh most times so if fixie riders wanna tease me for riding with brakes and freewheel then be my guest and settle it in a race.

Hmmm 35 to 45 kmh? Solo?

35 maybe if you are a quite fit club rider. I'd still call that tempo really.

When I was living in Scotland in 07/08 I'd do 100 mile solo training riders at ~30 kmh.

Now if you can do a 40 k in 1 hr that is getting quite decent. That is not cruising by any means though.

Of course average speed is effected by many things..winds, road quality blah blah,. but there is no way you 'cruise' at 45 k/hr even as an elite rider.

Not a big fixie fan to be honest. I've got my SS and I used to train on that. I like brakes and ability to free wheel when I need it. Can't tolerate the 'cool fixie brigade'.

Edited by Tony de Wonderful

fyi, i just accidently watched a rogercordia video on youtube so i'm in a bad mood now

something else that shits me off about the current fixy trend is that people call them fixy's even if they aren't fixed wheel. if they have a freewheel they are single speeds and have been around for quite a few years now, but were generally mtb's or 26 or 29" bmx bikes with the odd road bike version. just because it can have a fixed wheel attached to it doesn't automatically make it a fixy. if you are running the freewheel then it is a single speed.

and technically 'fixy' isn't a new category of bike. they are just track bikes with brakes added to make them legal (if they have brakes). some will be done with retro styling to make them look like bikes that were around 50 years ago. even flat bar fixies aren't new. all that is different is that the original ones had bars shaped like a boomerang and the new ones have mtb bars on them. so to anyone that is riding a fixy to be different, you aren't different, you are just 40 years behind the rest of us. what next? is holden going to bring back the FJ and revive the old 186 and 202 engines to put in them? would they expect people to go and buy a car that handles like rhino on ice and has a 3.3L 6 cylinder engine that can put out an impressive 80kw? no. everyone would think it is a bucket of shit and not touch it. but apprently the cycling world is different. what was once shit and hopeless is now shit and hopeless but cool.

maybe i should see the guy i sed to work with who still has his original fixed wheel racer from when he raced back in the 60's so i can be cool. in fact i would be super cool because it even has a bent frame and forks from being crashed, meaning that when you turn the pedals nearly hit the front tyre because it sits about 2" back from where it should.

fyi, i just accidently watched a rogercordia video on youtube so i'm in a bad mood now

something else that shits me off about the current fixy trend is that people call them fixy's even if they aren't fixed wheel. if they have a freewheel they are single speeds and have been around for quite a few years now, but were generally mtb's or 26 or 29" bmx bikes with the odd road bike version. just because it can have a fixed wheel attached to it doesn't automatically make it a fixy. if you are running the freewheel then it is a single speed.

and technically 'fixy' isn't a new category of bike. they are just track bikes with brakes added to make them legal (if they have brakes). some will be done with retro styling to make them look like bikes that were around 50 years ago. even flat bar fixies aren't new. all that is different is that the original ones had bars shaped like a boomerang and the new ones have mtb bars on them. so to anyone that is riding a fixy to be different, you aren't different, you are just 40 years behind the rest of us. what next? is holden going to bring back the FJ and revive the old 186 and 202 engines to put in them? would they expect people to go and buy a car that handles like rhino on ice and has a 3.3L 6 cylinder engine that can put out an impressive 80kw? no. everyone would think it is a bucket of shit and not touch it. but apprently the cycling world is different. what was once shit and hopeless is now shit and hopeless but cool.

maybe i should see the guy i sed to work with who still has his original fixed wheel racer from when he raced back in the 60's so i can be cool. in fact i would be super cool because it even has a bent frame and forks from being crashed, meaning that when you turn the pedals nearly hit the front tyre because it sits about 2" back from where it should.

Point taken, i just like the look of simplicity... none of these fking gear levers and so on... pure, unadultered simplicity... :action-smiley-069:

i used to ride brakeless so that i could feel when i was going to fall over when pulling a manual..

so scary.

oh yeah, and i've never ridden a fixie, does the hub that locks up when i backpedal count? what was that, the geisha?

Edited by xALmoN

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...