Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have one of those JJR split/dumps on my ECR33. I concur on the fitment issue. I had to use a pipe bender to alter the straight portion to clear the underside of the car. They can also be incredibly annoying to install because of the design, the bolts/studs are hard to reach due to the joining of the pipes to the flange.

While it improved power and decreased spool time, the wastegate swing valve hits the flange at max opening. My tuner says it causes boost creep because the wastegate pipe is too small. It works but could be better.

these are supposed to be one of the best http://www.moonface.co.jp/mfr/ex/exhaust/exchamber-pro.htm

post-37015-1220059895_thumb.jpg

post-37015-1220059963_thumb.jpg

Why do manufacturers like tomi make the bellmouth style aposed to a split dump if they are not a better design?

I just brought a JJR bellmouth front/dump pipe........ Which i must say, looks to be quite poor quality.

I asked around and most people said that the bellmouth was a better design than the split dump.

Why do manufacturers like tomi make the bellmouth style aposed to a split dump if they are not a better design?

I just brought a JJR bellmouth front/dump pipe........ Which i must say, looks to be quite poor quality.

I asked around and most people said that the bellmouth was a better design than the split dump.

Hi, i'm just about to buy this dump/front pipe from JJR and just wondering about the fitment on the product? bolt straight on? any mod need to be done to make it fit perfect? what gasket did u use?

how about the X-Force one? any info or feedback guys?

Thanks

Why do manufacturers like tomi make the bellmouth style aposed to a split dump if they are not a better design?

I just brought a JJR bellmouth front/dump pipe........ Which i must say, looks to be quite poor quality.

I asked around and most people said that the bellmouth was a better design than the split dump.

Hey,

split-dump is 'apparently' inherently better because the gas coming off the exhaust wheel is flowing in radically

different directions than the gas bypassing the wheel. The split designs are designed to minimize the impact

that the merge has by merging flow after it's had some time to laminarize itself.

Most 'bolt-on' pipes that try to do this are hamstrung because they have a very limited distance

(10-15cm or so) to do it before the merge (in order to bolt on to the existing system).

Most folks in the know recommend a much larger distance (30cm+) before wg/turbine merge to gain appreciable benefit.

So if you want to go down the split-dump path on an internal-gate design:

a) ensure that the wastegate path is as closed to sealed-off as possible

b) ensure that the split pipes are longer than 30cm.

Hope this helps,

Saliya

  • 3 weeks later...

SAU Members,

I may as well put my 2 cents worth in too. I apologize now in advance.

Call Best Mufflers in NSW and they'll tell you one or the other (bellmouth or split) is the better dump pipe for turbo applications.

Call Hi Tech Mufflers and they'll tell you something else.

Call the manufacturers of the dump pipes and it gets more confusing. (not that they aren't very very helpfull)

It seems that where performance gains are quoted, they're usually overstated.

It seems that even with long time experience in this field, opinions vary.

A technical understanding of exhaust gas flows from the turbo, in relation to computer modelling or the monitoring of actual results between various products and manufacturers would be a great thing, and maybe even settle a few arguments.

(Maybe someone like Hi Performance Imports or Zoom magazines can run a tech article on this issue)

Most of us understand the split gases non-turbulent separation and flow into a split system can aid turbo response, but there seem to be times when the differences in gains are insignificant.

There is no doubt though, that theres better response and a few more kilowatts on offer by going with either a better aftermarket bellmouth (say X-Force) or split system (say BOS Importing).

In my humble opinion, the Aussie manufacture is much better.

I can attest to the gains on the last two R33's I've owned and modified, and now on the R34 GTT, that at least the BOS Importing unit is simply much better than the OEM bellmouth.

Research what you want to purchase thoroughly. Compare the shape, angles, connection point of split pipe, design, flange arrangement, bolt hole position and various connections.

You will find they are pretty much different.

(I have no interest in promoting BOS Importing by the way)

Hope this helps.

Regards

Jim (TR34GT-000 & TR34GT)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...