Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey,

Ok so i have just put a new rb20 and r33 gearbox into my car, on first start up it started making a weird sound, that sound is now gone as im guessing it was just to do with no oil at top of the engine and the fact that the o-ring on injector 6 was completely screwed so it wasnt getting any fuel,

This engine was running sweet when i pulled it out of this other skyline btw,

so ive put it into my car, i got the ecu Dr Drift chipped, and also put in a Z32 afm that i also purchased off him,

My car is running ok, it runs on all 6 cylinders, and has a pop every now and then (too much fuel) and then if i rev it at all it floods the engine and drops a fair few cylinders and stops,

so ive been talking with dr drift and hes says the tune on the ECU should be close to perfect and should be able to drive on it, which i believe as my bro's car had the same chip and was sweet,

I sent dr drift how i have wired up the afm and he said i did it all right, (btw im waiting on response from him today as i just checked the afm for voltage and sent him the results) so i got from black wire to the white wire a voltage of .46V which i think its ment to b around .5V, so that seems ok,

I also did a ECU test, the code came up 55 so everything is checking out ok,

Do you guys think it may be a faulty afm? obviously me and dr drift will hopefully find out what it is this arvo, but i thought it wont hurt getting other opinions,

Thanks JV

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233279-what-is-wrong-with-my-rb20/
Share on other sites

yeah i know thats what i was thinking but dr drift thinks the tune should be pretty close which i believe, i dno i guess i will go voer everything with him tomorrow and if nothing shows what it could b, then i will tow it to a dyno and get it tuned

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...