Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just wondering what's more cost effective

Rebuilding the current rb25 or dropping an rb26 motor and box in there

Why? Because I can LOL , I know there's heaps of advantages with the rb26 + I'll get to have twins the only thing stopping me at the moment is what sort of labour hours it will take + my motor currently has the following mods

52mm radiator

Intercooler

PFC

Turbo back exhaust

The obvious pod and enclosure

+ I just got some gauges put in

I'm just not sure what will have to be sold off and what can stay to work perfect

The cooler will have to be changed the dump and front pipe as well

How about the radiator ?? Will the radiator hoses fit??

The PFC can make way for a gtr PFC or stock ecu for a while

The reasoning behind this is it'll cost 4k for a mild build to handle roughly 325rwkw while a gtr engine shouldn't need a build for that much should it? Plus I get solid lifters and the 6throttles and twins not to mention extra capacity

Anyhow calling everyone that's done this before to advise me on what has to be changed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/234300-rb26-engine-conversion/
Share on other sites

Depending on the age/condition, the RB26 will need more than 4k thrown at it just like the 25.

Either way, the RB26 wont take 330rwkw forever. Few years probably but thats it

The extra capacity, is next to nothing, its not even a 100cc, about half that :(

A 26 conversion isnt cheap, and IMO you'd be crazy not to at least through new pistons/bearings etc through it before installing it

26 ain't cheap, to fix, parts etc.

Rebuild the 25= fresh engine, tough etc.

If you got the money though, go for it lol.

I agree with GTRsean. If you got the funds, go for the RB26.

But to be honest what is your target RWHP figure????

That will determine whether you even need to go RB26.

I have seen some strong RB25's doing 500RWHP all day every day................... :(

I have two GTR's. But that does not mean that I will push and promote RB26's........

RB25 is a very solid motor.................

Again, what is your target figure?????

rb20s are cheap and strong

That is true. RB20's are a fantastic motor.

However he already has a RB25. So why would he put an RB20 into his ride?????

It's a case (as he stated in his initial thread post) whether he should rebuild his Rb25 or outlay for a RB26 (Money Pit..............)

yeah target is 300rwkw to around 350rwkw umm it's just for a bit of fun really something to use at the odd track day, motorkhanas etc

Well combining my tax return and savings I've got 7k and I really would like to keep everything as hidden as possible from the eyes of the po po's so low mounts, I've forgot to mention it used to be a non turbo (turbo conversion) so I'm not even sure how much more it can take I've got 202rwkw at the moment oh I'm not doubting the rb25's they are awesome but I am doubting my de bottem end haha, I've had a chat with a few places and really they said just for 300rwkw there is a low mount that can support it + I can get a mild build with gtr rods + upgraded rod bolts and pistons that they have said should be enough for that power figure (and ofcourse a compression ratio of 9:1)

+ I'm not sure how much machining it will need

Anyway at the moment i'm just in the thinking stages

Cheers

i know my rb20 comment made me look stupid yet it wasnt seious, on a serious note however have you considered an rb30, still looks stock so popo dont notice, depending on the turbo can keep you current exhuast and intercooler, retune the power fc you have and keep your radiator, would take more money to get it to 8000 revs though, yet a 500cc increase you will notice more than just 100cc

I think with your budget ($7K) you don't have a choice but to go with the RB25 route.

By the time to buy a decent RB26/gearbox +Turbos and associated supporting hardware you will blow the $7K budget.

If you can save more you will not regret getting the RB26.

But as Nismoid said before, the Rb26 is really only 100cc's more. What the point of going RB26???????????

yeah I have considered it, I've also seen people just chuck the stock rb30 with upgraded bolts on make a reliable 270rwkw what do you guys think it's cheap will last 250rwkw and will leave me cash for other areas of the car

so we are looking at pistons, gtr rods upgraded rod bolts, acl bearings and new gaskets all round that only looks to be setting me back around 2k will I need to do any machining etc? After all it's not an all out build this way I can spend on other areas , maybe If I can keep it to 4k then I can spend 2k on the turbo and 1k tune up, but like I said before if I did the rb30 just with rod bolts and gaskets it'll only be like 1k then 1k bolting it up then 2-3k on new turbo and I'd have 2k to spend on other areas of the car, who's the guy that's done this before he just bolted a stock rb30 bottom end up to his rb25 bigger turbo and started drag racing?

I did the same thing I wanted to upgrade to a rb26 instead of the rb25 and it has cost me in the excess of $20k, this is what you should do if you go for the rb26..

Cost of engine $3000-$5500 (please make sure they supply comp test and op test & a warranty if possible)

Cost of head gasket from Nissan $80.00 this is so you can pull it down and inspect, there is nothing wrong with genuine head gaskets. This is where it cost me so much, engine was sold to me as a good runner but we pulled it down and found damage to the block and pistons so complete rebuild.

Rewire of wiring harness to run rb26 computer $200-$600 (depending on where you go)

Computer $300-$5500 (depending on where you go & what you use)

Modify intercooler plumbing $150-$500 again (depending on where you go)

Modification to sump $300-800 (depending on where you go)

If you want to make power at high rpm a good oil pump and coller is recomended, can go into the whole debate here but an N1 is a good start its supperior to a standard item to start with.

A good harmonic ballancer ATI or ROSS most profer ATI as do I.

Oil control, while modifing the sump ensure extra compacity and baffles maybe even a return from the back of the head to sump.

If you are staying with the twins make sure you change the dump pipes while the engine is out of the car likewise if changing the turbos. (its hard enough doing it when the engine is out let alone in the car)

Replace all heater/vacume/oil lines under intake plenum while engine is out too this is for peice of mind.

I think staying the the rb25 and upgrading the rob bolts to start with is a much wiser choice and will be cheaper in the end. I could keep going but hopefully this will be some help to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...