Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a set of purple top RX7 injectors and I'm having some problems fitting them in. I've got a modified RB20 fuel rail which they fit into quite nicely, but not with the O-rings. I tried pushing them in with the O-rings lubricated with a bit of WD but they won't go in very easily at all. I don't want to push them in too hard in case something breaks.

The O-rings are looking a little tired anyway, I was thinking of buying a new set. Can someone tell me where I can get some from and what I am asking for exactly?

Also, the plastic wiring loom clip doesn't fit. It looks similar though, is it possible to modify the clip slightly to make it fit? If not, where can I get some clips that will fit?

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23463-installing-rx7-injectors-in-r33/
Share on other sites

Mine were side feed sards:)

Killer T has these injectors fitted, not sure if he fitted them himself? Might be worth a pm if he is still about.

New o-rings should only cost a couple of dollars each, and you should be able to source them from any fuel injection shop, or rotary shop. Would be a good idea to do this as matter of course, as if one goes on you life could get pretty messy, especially whilst boosting:p

I would hope they are pretty tight or they wont seal. I used engine oil to lube my sards up, and they were a pretty tight fit. Perhaps you need a slightly bigger holes in the fuel rail? Any engineering company should be able to help you out there, or a decent performance shop - hills would definately be able to help.

Well, the injectors themselves without the O-rings on fit almost perfectly. They just go straight in and are quite a snug fit without needing any force to push in. I think I just think the O rings need to be either newer/softer or just a tiny bit smaller. I'll take the lot in to an injection shop and see if they can help me with the plugs as well.

Anyone got any shop recommendations for a shop? Worst case I'll just take it to Hills when I'm ready to get it fitted, but for this simple stuff I'd rather do as much as I can at home. I'm pretty sure I can fit the whole thing myself as long as I get the O rings and wiring sorted. Should save an hour or 2 on labour at the workshop :D

I've got a front-facing plenum. This is the only reason why I bothered with the top-feed injectors really, I've heard it's a major pain in the arse to fit top-feeds under the stock plenum.

I didn't modify it, I bought it pre-modified :cool: I'll take some pics this weekend. I will also draw up some plans for anyone wanting to do the same mods to an RB20 fuel rail. You'll need to cut the metal fuel return line off plus the mounting brackets, and put on 2 new ones of a different length.

From looking at it, I wouldn't want to work it all out myself before modifying. With a plan done up, it looks like it'll take a few hours with some sheet metal and an oxy welder. Less if you're good at welding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...