Jump to content
SAU Community

Ecu Correct One?

Hunting Lions

By Hunting Lions,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hunting Lions Contributor

Hunting Lions

Posted
Posted

the remap in the r32 gts4 that i bought is dodgy. it doesnt really idle properly and never has and it has started overloading the engine with fuel so i m sourcing another one .

i m just no sure whether all standard comps match all standard r32's.

mine is a manual turbo and the person that i m sourcing it off sent me a part number being

23710 11V10 MEC-R213 B 3211

i have been looking online for about 2 hours with absolutely no luck.

any help would eb appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235286-ecu-correct-one/
Share on other sites
QWK32 Veteran

QWK32

Posted
Posted

that one will work. i had a couple of different ones that worked in my 32. one of them was that number, with the MEC-213 chip and the other had a MEC-126 chip. both worked fine in my 92 model R32 with RB20DET manual. the ones with the MEC-213 chip are the newer model ones, around 92 models.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235286-ecu-correct-one/#findComment-4121645
Share on other sites
Hunting Lions Contributor

Hunting Lions

Posted
  • Author
Posted
that one will work. i had a couple of different ones that worked in my 32. one of them was that number, with the MEC-213 chip and the other had a MEC-126 chip. both worked fine in my 92 model R32 with RB20DET manual. the ones with the MEC-213 chip are the newer model ones, around 92 models.

it is an 89 but its a gts4, i ve been told anyways that is all controlled seperately, the comp i have sourced is costing 65 and i ve got some injectors ready and waiting for 20 .

its just going to be a pain pulling out tha 550 sards putting the standard ones back in with the standard comp and hoping for tha best cos i m only gambling that it is the remap

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235286-ecu-correct-one/#findComment-4124229
Share on other sites
KiwiRS4T Grand Master

KiwiRS4T

Posted
Posted
the remap in the r32 gts4 that i bought is dodgy. it doesnt really idle properly and never has and it has started overloading the engine with fuel so i m sourcing another one .

i m just no sure whether all standard comps match all standard r32's.

mine is a manual turbo and the person that i m sourcing it off sent me a part number being

23710 11V10 MEC-R213 B 3211

i have been looking online for about 2 hours with absolutely no luck.

any help would eb appreciated

That ECU number you have quoted appears to be for an auto.

Ref http://www4.wave.co.nz/~lakewood/Skyline/E...ntification.txt

but to get the correct ECU for your car you need to go on this site to "Vins you want fasted"and someone with access to the Nissan's "FAST"system will be able to give you the correct number for your car's ECU if you give them the number from the ID plate on your car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235286-ecu-correct-one/#findComment-4126013
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      lol, probably should have read further!
    • R32 TT
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By R32 TT · Posted

      Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...