Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Contemplating whether to get this turbo, looks like the one from horsepowerinabox and tweakit are very similar except tweakit has these for like $300 cheaper. Does anyone have either of these installed, whats boost like, laggy/spike?

Planning on running around 14-16psi with supporting mods, want 270-280rwkw, is this possible?

I want the bolt on option because already have a new dump and ex. manifold.

Any advice would be much appreciated before i fork out the dough.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235435-tweakit-3076r-rb25-bolt-on/
Share on other sites

Tweakit 3076r

Link to item.

Its internally gated. I know the 3071Rs had trouble with boost creep with a gate that was too small.

Any similar issues? also worried as to whether it would fit in the factory location easy enough and not melt anything.

Try a couple of searches, but some threads over the past 6-10 months or so indicated people were having a few problems with adequate boost control. Comments were generally directed towards boost creep (rising with revs, rather than hitting a target and staying level). It may be an issue limited to particular turbine rotor : housing combination so you'd have to inquire with those users which particular spec cartridge was used with their turbo.

FWIW, the cropped 56.5mm version of the GT30 turbine comes in an 84T and 90T spec. I don't know for sure, but suspect the 90T would have better venting and flow capability than the 84T. But there is a fair bit of science in getting the match right between rotor and housing so that internal aerodynamics work ok.

Regardless of who you're buying from, the advertised "bolt on" units are evidently built around a copied version of the OEM Nissan/Hitachi OP6 turbine casting as used on the Neo RB25 and VG30DET. I believe there are other sellers in Aust besides those mentioned who are shifting the same product. Due to the mix'n'match of rotor and housing, it is viewed as a wildcat and there is not likely any technical info available from either the seller or Garrett.

Worth doing a bit of searching and maybe a PM or two to those owners to see how they ended up working out. Let us know how things go please.

A huge grey are exists between black and white on this specific topic .

The sad fact of life is that a "bolt on turbo" is often a unit thats been compromised in an effort to make it "bolt on" in the std location .

I can't think of any production vehicle that ever came factory std with a Garrett petrol spec GT3076R , the fact that the water/oil/air plumbing is totally different to anything Nissan have on any of their engines tells me that they won't "bolt on" .

Generally the most difficult part of any non OEM turbo is making it fit between the std exhaust manifold and exhaust pipe/dump pipe . All sorts of bastard hybrid things are out there but few are designed to work as the turbocharger manufacturer intended them to .

Once you go to a non std exhaust (or compressor) housing you've changed the turbos configuration and it won't operate as the manufacturer advertises - in other words throw away all the compressor and turbine maps for that unit because they'd now mean zip .

To me staying with a std (or copy) Hitachi turbine housing has serious limitations if you want the best results . Really making a dump pipe for the Garrett IW GT30 turbine housings can't be that hard and at least then you'd know that the turbos turbine and housing are the critical matching set .

A real petrol spec GT3076R is an ~ 500 Hp capable turbocharger at its limit , I find it very hard to believe that the Hitachi 3 litre turbine housing (OP6 type thing) can handle anything like 500 Hp worth of exhaust gas so I can't see why anyone would want to go there with one .

Just a note on my expectations of that turbo , I mean 500 with its largest 1.06 A/R genuine Garrett GT30 turbine housing and don't forget it has the largest available (56T) version of their GT37 compressor wheel .

Now I can't say that the particular bolt on version you're looking at won't work , I strongly doubt that it would get anywhere its potential so hence the grey area .

One other thing I haven't mentioned on this board before , the only Hitach copy turbine housing I ever looked at was not real impressive compared to the real thing . When the waste gate flat valve was open its passage was partially blocked by what looked like like to me at the time an undersized main passage . How or why this is I don't know and I havent seen one since to see if they've improved . It's this sort of detail you can't see with the turbo in place .

Another problem I have is that those aftermarket housings have been "intended" for std and up to GT30 turbines and I can't see how they make a properly formed turbine nozzle function with different sized "holes" in the center of the housing .

To me turbine families are matched to turbine housings with internal shapes to suit that turbine family .

The stand out seems to be GCG's BB Hi Flows and no I don't know why , they are arguably one of the few bolt on Hi Flows that seem to work well - provided the rest of the engine is tuned to suit .

I think the bottom line is that if you truly want to run a GT3076R you need to run Garretts matching GT30 IW T3 flanged turbine housing (3 A/R sizes available BTW) . Really the only extra thing to make is the dump pipe because everything else besides the mounting flange is non std anyway .

Cubes , Mafia here and a few others have done it and there are some long threads about it here too .

As Nismoid would say do a search , cheers A .

Thanks for the input guys, and just so that u kno, i hav ran various searches and spent hours reding through info on the turbo. I just wanted to see if anyone has used one of these turbo's from either of th suppliers and the results/problems that they got from it.

Thanks again.

Now my next question would be would i be better off re-building and hiflowing my standard turbo than buying one of these?

Or do i cut my losses, sell the dump that i just bought and buy a garrett turbo with the original housings and get a dump made up?

The latter seems to be the better option its just a matter of who do i get to make up my dump pipe, or are there people selling dumps to suit the garrett turbine housings?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...