Jump to content
SAU Community

Willall Racing Buys Australia's First Official Complied/street Registered R35gtr


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes I might have to get rid of it now after reading that.....

I did however nickname it 'Ugly Betty' yesterday :)

One good thing though Craig, its not normally the headlights you would be seeing if you pulled up next to it....more like the tail lights :D

I have driven a friends GTR on a number of occassions here in Tokyo and it is an amazing vehicle.

Forgot to add, we swapped cars for a day - that was interesting..although i had to be a little more careful than him.

Youre fortunate in many ways.

One question..

How did you do it?...getting the car registered?

Here's a quick review I generated for my LS1 buddies. Driving around at 60km/h it really is 'interesting'....you know its a BAMF :D

"In fact it reminds me very much of the Lamborghini rather than a santisied Japanese car. The all wheel drive transmission transfer pumps are loud and whine away at the trafffic lights, the clutch is sharp on the takeup and needs some practice for smooth low speed getaways. Tyre noise from the RE070Rs is huge. The engine is solidly mounted enough that you can feel it through every pore, and the whine from what would seem to be semi-straight cut gears is ever present. Drive it slowly around town in manual mode and the engine is gruff and blustery revving and blipping the throttle as it picks gears....its an angry bastard of a thing and that gives it character

Without doubt the feature of the car is the gearbox. Unlike any I have driven which includes E-gear, SMG, and F1 shift, this thing picks a gear in the blink of an eye, both up and down without unbalancing the car or changing its 'stance' mid corner. Thrown around on a slippery surface or in point-and-shoot tarmac rally conditions the car is capable enough as to be described as unbeatable so immense is the traction, so balanced is the chassis. Its well, far, easily more capable and quicker than the drivers inputs in this case"

I couldnt agree with you more. Theres a lot of mechanical noise, the pumps and the gearbox being the main two culprits. Tyre noise depends on the road surface really - i noticed a pretty big swing there.

Its really restrained - like its waiting to get off the leash and that would be hard when the speed limit is 60. Ive had it up at 180 on the wangan here and it gets there bloody fast. A lot faster than my Fonz.

Only thing is - its uncompromising as a daily driver - its a little too hard but i spose what else do i expect.

The biggest surprise for me was the power delivery - it just surges and whooshes and gushes and farkin pins you. Hard.

Enjoy it.

One more question - what are you going to do about the speed limiter?

nice thats a good representation from old to new i think like most things it will grow on us

i for one coming from the mazda stable loved the Rx7's and when the Rx8 came out i was the same like Blerh :D but when i saw it modified i was like that is actually pretty nice

anyways enough about mazda's on a skyline forum :)

veilside_ver1_rx8.jpg<<referance image

Nice photo there Martin.

But in response to Craig's comment - it doesn't look ANYWHERE near as big on its own. When in the lineup it does look bloated, but let me assure you that the proportions are spot on, and when you see the car on its own it doesn't look that big.

im not saying its the ugliest thing i have ever seen, but i just think its a bit of a let down.

all that whopping technoogy, and the body seems, well....rushed imo.

i admit, it is a great car though.

im not saying its the ugliest thing i have ever seen, but i just think its a bit of a let down.

all that whopping technoogy, and the body seems, well....rushed imo.

i admit, it is a great car though.

dude the car has a drag co-efficient of 0.27... thats >low az brew<.... i daresay it looks that way for a very specific reason :D (notice it has a wide front similar to some certain audis out there, coincidence? I think not)

-D

looks far better in that grey/silver they have in my opinion. I'm Intrigued by it and would love to see how they go some day but i still have a soft spot for the original GTR layout. Apart from 4wd, twin turbo and the rear lights i find they've steered away from the GTR image.

looks far better in that grey/silver they have in my opinion. I'm Intrigued by it and would love to see how they go some day but i still have a soft spot for the original GTR layout. Apart from 4wd, twin turbo and the rear lights i find they've steered away from the GTR image.

Agreed. i still really like the car for what it is tho.

V formation TT 6 = FAIL :(

RB :(

i was thinking that also, seen as all ive owned are inline 6's hence the name ;)

but they did need to make a change they couldnt bring out another gtr pretty much the same

Edited by Inline 6
V formation TT 6 = FAIL :(

RB :(

The v6 is there for a reason. Compact light weight, provides better weight distribution.

I'voe toyed with the idea of a nice all alloy light weight VQ30/VQ35/VQ40DET in the R32 with a nice GT40/42 having off the side should the rb30 fork lift/boat motor ever pop.

The v6 is there for a reason. Compact light weight, provides better weight distribution.

I'voe toyed with the idea of a nice all alloy light weight VQ30/VQ35/VQ40DET in the R32 with a nice GT40/42 having off the side should the rb30 fork lift/boat motor ever pop.

you've changed man

you used to be cool.

:(

3.8l twin cam straight 6 TT... could have easily been done and it would have been PORNNNNNNN!!!!

RB38DETT sounds A OK to me haha

Edited by IZZMO 33
It may take me awhile to get a R35 but at least i already own the plate (GTR35)

damn was just lookin at that.

give u $500 for it :(

V formation TT 6 = FAIL :(

RB :(

get with the times

V formation ftw.

aside to martin: How is this car on rolling acceleration compared to a TT 350z? I know the gearchanges would be quicker. and it would have a bit more torque, and different ratio's everywhere..... actually probably hard to compare lol.

wtf.

Youd think if you ask a question in here and being from adelaide and having driven the GTR, youd think youd get a response or 2... :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...