Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is something that is not often made very clear even in the specs:

For a NON-VSPEC R33 GT-R, do they still have an Active-LSD?

(different Attesa computer, I know, but still an active one?)

As in, power can be transfered from one side of the rear wheel to the other electronically?

Also, do the FRONTS have an LSD? Active or mechanical?

Anyone know for sure?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23727-gt-r-attesa-lsd-question/
Share on other sites

The R33 GT-R (non-V-spec) has a couple of "wet" multi-plate LSD`s front and rear with the ATTESA-ETS.

The R33 V-spec (and N1:))adds an active LSD on the rear, with the ATTESA-ETS Pro system.

**I`m reading this from Japanese, and they say it`s a "Shisshikitaban" clutch LSD... shisshikitaban literally means "wet-process multi-plate/surface". I have no idea what the usual English automotive term is, sorry.

Originally posted by acediac

the R32 workshop manual and the front diff seems to be an open diff... maybe it's different on the R33?

Thanks!

The R32/33/34 Bible I`m reading from doesn`t specify if the multi-plate LSD`s are on the front or not, it just says "Shisshikitaban LSD" under the diff section... after seeing some Nismo front LSD internals available, I just assumed they were LSD on the front from factory.

Evidently not. After more research, and as far as I can tell, the ATESSA E-TS is is the same for the R32 and 33, with an open front diff and multi-plate rear LSD (V-Specs have the Active LSD on the rear).

Sorry for the confusion:)

Originally posted by Rezz

The R32/33/34 Bible I`m reading from doesn`t specify if the multi-plate LSD`s are on the front or not, it just says "Shisshikitaban LSD" under the diff section... after seeing some Nismo front LSD internals available, I just assumed they were LSD on the front from factory.

Evidently not. After more research, and as far as I can tell, the ATESSA E-TS is is the same for the R32 and 33, with an open front diff and multi-plate rear LSD (V-Specs have the Active LSD on the rear).

Sorry for the confusion:)

Ya my car certainly doesn't behave like it has a front LSD. I've seen a GT-R Japanese magazine that talks about Cusco LSDs for front and rear though.. I wonder if I can just buy an LSD for the front. I wonder if the front transfercase/driveshaft will handle a front LSD load though... obviously it wasnt designed to...

When I get my scanner I should scan that page for you to interpret, Rezz :D

BTW which GT-R bible are you reading?

Cheers!

Originally posted by acediac

BTW which GT-R bible are you reading?

Re: Re: Re: How diffrent is VSPEC and VSPEC 2  

(Quote:)  

It's a Hyper Rev/Nissan/JAF silver special edition... my most prized automotive book, it chronicles the timeline from BNR32 to 34 with every concievable model variation and detail... in Japanese!

It`s called "1989-2002 Skyline GT-R Memorial"... as per the explanation above.

Originally posted by acediac

I think I seriously need to start learning Japanese... :D

Set aside 5 years for that, and 3 of them in Japan!

Seriously though, learning Katakana and Hiragana Japanese script would help out immensly when browsing internet sites and magazines in Jap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...