Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just bought a nismo dash and ej1 ecu but it didnt come with a remote, need to either buy one or get someone to program a remote for me using there ej1 remote, so potentially you could make money for 5 minutes work, any help would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237885-need-help-with-ej1-remote/
Share on other sites

never heard of EJ1

what the hell is it ?

It is an ecu that hooks up to your ecu and displays on a screen like this nismo dash:

DSC00118.jpg

This is what the remote looks like:

DSC00117.jpg

This is what the ecu looks like:

post-27276-1222564008_thumb.jpg

I have everything here apart from the remote, you cant change the screen without the remote, i thought it may have gone back to a standard screen (tacho and speedo) after it was dissconnected from power but it didnt, it is stuck on the lap time screen which is of no use to me.

Edited by W0rp3D
hey i think i seen that in the for sales section a little while ago, or ebay. if u didnt buy it thru the forums go check it out, it may pop up somere and you could ask the previous owner.

The one that was for sale on here was bought off ebay and i bought it off here, never came with the remote when sold on ebay.

gota say that looks hot as... can it work with other ecu's? i.e pfc ? (I know I have a hand controller) shhh....

also...checked import monster for ya.... no remotes on there atm...

Will work with the power fc, it actually wires into your loom and gets the readings straight from the sensors.

Another option is one called hks camp, just be carefull, there is a camp and a camp2, the original is apparently wired into the loom but the camp2 runs off the consult port and wont work with an aftermarket ecu.

I did find one on yahoo and got all excited till i realised that the auction ended in june, there was 6 remotes in that auction but i could find an email to contact the guy to see if he wanted to sell the ej1 remote.

Try ring EPSON ppl they might be some help??? since it has been made by EPSON :P

I knew there was something i forgot, melbourne office close's at 5 so i tried the perth office (there 2 hours behind) three times and no one answered, slack arse sand gropers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...