Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys.

the R32 gtst im looking at buying got nocked back for the following.

RIMS 18" and front tyers just on low tread indicators

FMIC

POD FILTER exsposed

the plate on the air box side that is used in GTR's to allow the intercooler pipe has being removed to allow for the pip. whats the go here

muffler to big but ground clearence and noise ok.

im trying to look through the vic roads web site atm but it's a nightmear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238836-need-help-with-rwc-for-r32-gtst/
Share on other sites

hi guys.

the R32 gtst im looking at buying got nocked back for the following.

RIMS 18" and front tyers just on low tread indicators

FMIC

POD FILTER exsposed

the plate on the air box side that is used in GTR's to allow the intercooler pipe has being removed to allow for the pip. whats the go here

muffler to big but ground clearence and noise ok.

im trying to look through the vic roads web site atm but it's a nightmear.

wtf is to big?

to noisy yeah , but to big?

my wang is huge and i dont get knocked back for that?

lols

pod filter exposed?

strap it to the shell of the car with bendable metal or whatever works.....should make it road worthy

id be taking it to another mech

some are dogs about RWC's others are fair chill as long as you meet main safety requirements

Edited by willL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...