Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stage 2 Exterior Detail on Jeffs new toy.

Build seems very good on these, much better than previous models, as expected. Paint Quality is excellent.

Wasn't in the best shape as I was doing to first detail since build.

Here are the befores:

Before_01.jpg

Before_02.jpg

Before_03.jpg

Before_04.jpg

Before_05.jpg

Before_06.jpg

Before_07.jpg

More befores, after a wash and a good look at the paint, it's worse than I thought, much, much worse.

Before_08.jpg

Before_09.jpg

Before_10.jpg

Before_11.jpg

Before_12.jpg

Before_13.jpg

Before_14.jpg

d.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239377-detail-gtr-red/
Share on other sites

Here are a couple of Paint Correction shots:

During_01.jpg

During_02.jpg

and a few Second Wash shots:

During_03.jpg

During_04.jpg

During_05.jpg

During_06.jpg

-----

Complete:

After_01.jpg

____________

After_02.jpg

____________

After_03.jpg

____________

After_11.jpg

____________

After_05.jpg

____________

After_06.jpg

____________

After_07.jpg

____________

After_08.jpg

____________

After_09.jpg

____________

After_10.jpg

____________

After_12.jpg

____________

After_13.jpg

____________

After_14.jpg

____________

After_15.jpg

____________

After_16.jpg

____________

After_17.jpg

____________

After_18.jpg

____________

After_19.jpg

____________

After_20.jpg

____________

After_21.jpg

____________

After_22.jpg

____________

After_23.jpg

____________

After_24.jpg

____________

Thanks Jeff & Pete,

d.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239377-detail-gtr-red/#findComment-4181978
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, thanks very much for the kind words.

Was a joy to work on the car and can't thank Pete for pushing Jeff through the door, also Jeff was a great guy, nice to meet him.

The Stage 2 Exterior Detail is $320, you can find all the details on our website here

Thanks again!

d.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239377-detail-gtr-red/#findComment-4183415
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...