Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, i have an R33 GTS-T and recently it has been starting quite wierd, ususally i turn the key give it the sufficient amount of cranks and presto shes going.

As of recently i will start her up i need to hold they key cranking for a bit longer to get it going. If i let go at the amount of cranks i would usually let go at it feels like its going to stall or does..

-Car is stock no recent mods put on.

-Recently changed the battery and checked the alternator, i thought the battery was what was causing it originally but it seems not to be the case.

Does anyone have a clue as to what it might be as im puzzled??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239896-starting-is-wierd/
Share on other sites

timing isn't right.... check that it is set to 15 degrees or take it to the work shop that did the service...

bit of a noob mate lol, how would i check if its at 15 degress?

Also could it be the starter motor on its way out?

Edited by MP_R33

you need to use a timing light... it fires a light every time the No.1 cylinder fires, you aim it at the harmonic balancer. The balancer has markings of 5 degrees on it and there is a mark on the lower timing belt cover.

best to get your mechanic to check it...

you need to use a timing light... it fires a light every time the No.1 cylinder fires, you aim it at the harmonic balancer. The balancer has markings of 5 degrees on it and there is a mark on the lower timing belt cover.

best to get your mechanic to check it...

Ok awesome. really appreciate ur help :)

Just a scenario, lets say it is the timing belt thats off, is it really doing any damage to the car or is it just making it harder to start?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...