Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cant help myself this time , something for petrol heads to think about and a bit of drag queen drama blog over C02 and global warming .

http://blogs.drive.com.au/2008/07/v8_supercar_greenwash.html

Something to read if theres nothing doing ATM .

Enjoy , A .

Edited by discopotato03
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240739-more-e85-blogblather/
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure the tip in 30% more fuel idea is what you have to do real world . E85's ability to run more advanced timing I think means the mixture strength may not have to alter as much as say ULP to make the same torque numbers .

Also to some degree spraying in a bit more (by comparison) can have some advantages like evaporative cooling (charge air cooling) so it's not all necessarily bad . I think it's a case of a bit more ign advance/a bit more charge cooling/a bit of this a bit of that and over all making it all work in positive ways .

It's early days for tuning E85 in Australia and I have every confidence that Ausie tenacity (Sp ?) will ring every ft/lb out of this stuff - given time .

The BIG thing is getting the fuel distributors to market it everywhere and what's holding that up is the lack of flex fueled OEM cars . SAAB has one and the FF'd VE Commode Door is supposed to be in the pipe . It's a sort of chicken and egg thing with the chichen run being expensive (I did read US 200G to install approved E85 tank and pumps) and a luke warm interest in the eggs . The fuel suppliers want to be confident that their investment in equipment is not wasted so the toe in the water exercise can take time .

Overseas there have been tax breaks with E85 and it remains to be seen whether our Governments will favour incentive over revenue . If it gets tax breaks here the cost/consumption ratio needs to be line ball or better to encourage Mr Mrs people mover to buy it . We as "timing lords" want it for other reasons but we are a very small component of the buying public .

In time , cheers A .

Said to have more hydrogen and less carbon than ULP so on the swings and roundabouts less C02 you'd think . Have seen mention of much less HC and with lower combustion temps possibly less nitrogen oxide aka NOx .

Like all consumer goods the focus is on price , some want the physical benefits and others get wet over the "green" aspects . If you can have it all go for it - I wish the fuel suppliers would .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
    • That worked out PERFECTLY! Thank you big time to JJ. He was able to swap me his stock diff. He drove all the way to me as well. Killer! Removal & install was pretty straightforward. The diff itself is HEAVY. So that’s a 2 man job.  Man does the car drive nice now! Couldn’t have worked out any better 👌
×
×
  • Create New...