Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

For those with R33 gtst's, and harnessess - where have you bolted the shoulder straps to in the rear of the car?

I have used the bolt holes on the backseat from the back right hand seat, (where the existing seat belts would go if the backseat was there) however the angle of the harness is around 45 degrees...looking at the cams manual, it says the acceptable range is no more than 40 degrees...

So what have others done?

Is it enforced strongly also?

Pics would be handy if ya have them :cheers:

Thanks guys,

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241272-r33-harness-and-cams-rules/
Share on other sites

Chris its rarely enforced strictly in a road car.

However one option is a purpose made bar that goes from tower to tower across the rear parcel shelf. I have made a fair few of them for R33's and they work fine.

Edited by Risking

Chris someone (and I can't for the life of me remember who) make a parcel shelf strut brace. If you can find out who makes them great or go with Brads idea. The rear seat belt points suck,,,in a roll-over your shoulders are subject to way to much force.

Just keep in mind cams rules are minimum requirements,,,always try to do better.

Neil.

Cusco do parcel shelf bars for the R33 from memory.

There okay and you can wrap a harness around them, but not really strong enough in my opinion.

Ill try and dig up some photos of the last one I made but basicly it was 38mmOD 2.5 wall thickness CDS (same as minimum spec cage material) It had decent sized mounts and the harness mounts were the usual eyelets with welded in thread bosses.

Also did one for an RX7 not to long ago (actually you'd know the owner Chris, Craig Baker)

Nah Brad It wasn't the Cusco one,,,I bought one off Johnny at UAS some years ago that was good quality steel that would do the job.

I actually gave it back to him thinking it was wrong. Strupid me.

Really the only way to secure the shoulder belts properly would have to be a half or full cage.

But after saying that the series 2 GTS-T's have mounting points for a strut brace in the boot which I use. Cutting the rear fire wall to run belts through there would be another way.

The Skylines parcel shelf is no way strong enough in my opinion,,,but the strut towers would be.

Neil.

Hey Chris,

My harness is mounted in the back seat belt bolt holes also and i have roughly worked mine out to be 33 deg below horizontal or 57 if you are measuring from the vertical postion? When i fitted mine i never checked cams i followed the instalation guide that cam with mine ( it is a Takata harness ). I can post up pictures if you cant remember what it looks like or you are more than welcome to drop in on your way home on Sat and have a look.

I have attached the page out of the manual for you. Would mine pass?

harnessguide.tiff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...